RegistrationPlease register at: WhosComingToRegistry19032003Agenda
40 min presentations will include 15 mins for Q&A 20 min presentations will include 5 mins for Q&A LocationLondon e-Science Centre, 19-20 March 2003South Kensington Campus Imperial College London SW7 2AZ United Kingdom Travel infoNotesThe meeting kicked off on time but was delayed by problems in getting the telecon working. In the end, Bob set up a NASA telecon link which we used for the rest of the two days. Because of the delays, we fudged the above agenda, dropping all discussions and running the presentations one after the other.19 March 2003: PresentationsA number of people made presentations on topics related to the VO Registry. I scribbled down a few notes during a couple of the presentations and have added them here. Maybe others who attended can add to these.GLUpresented by Andre Schaaff: download presentation from below | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
If we apply the GLU paradigm to REGISTRIES:
The structure would be:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OAIpresented by Andy Powell: download presentation from below
JINIpresented by Marco Leoni: download presentation from below
Metadata Requirementspresented by Anita Richards: download presentation from below
Coveragepresented by Clive Page: download presentation from below
AstroVirtelpresented by Alberto Micol: download presentation from below
AstroGrid Registrypresented by Elizabeth Auden: download presentation from below I was out of the room for most of this presentation: perhaps others can contribute. My notes relate to the following discussion.
DiscussionWe began discussing 'Scope' of the Registry WG. First thing agreed was what the Registry registered: services or resources. We went for Resources as a more generic name for the entries. The scope discussion didn't get much further so we agreed to continue the next day with discussion of the seven work packages that I'd defined at the end of my first set of slides.20 March 2003: Work PackagesThe discussion of Day 2 concentrated on each work package, what it should cover and some initial goals. As it happened we dropped from the initial seven WPs to five, as follows. I tended to update the Day 2 slides as we went along so they reflect what was agreed for each WP.Rwp01: Management, Policy & Documentation standardsScope:
Rwp02: Requirements, Science Cases, Use Cases, Test CasesScope:
Rwp03: Metadata specsScope:
Rwp04: Registry replication and interfacesScope:
Rwp05: Implementation coordinationThis WP began life as one to create a relatively simple reference implementation. It was felt that this was unnecessary given the number of projects underway. Scope:
Conclusion
Attachmentssee below
|