IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : !!!
LatestDiscussionOnVOUnits : Discussion on specific aspects of the document 1.0. WD-VOUnits-1.0-20111216.pdf 2011 December 16 - first release of Version 1.0 WD-VOUnits-v0.3-20110508.pdf 2011 May 08 draft IVOA Note minor update WD-VOUnits-v0.2-20090522.pdf 2009 May 22 draft IVOA Note 2009 March Draft IVOA working draft ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : !!!
Latest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | DiscussionOnVOUnits : Discussion on specific aspects of the document. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | DiscussionOnVOUnits : Discussion on specific aspects of the document 1.0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | WD-VOUnits-1.0-20111216.pdf 2011 December 16 - first release of Version 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD-VOUnits-v0.3-20110508.pdf 2011 May 08 draft IVOA Note minor update
WD-VOUnits-v0.2-20090522.pdf 2009 May 22 draft IVOA Note
2009 March Draft IVOA working draft
ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18
OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers <--
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : !!!
Latest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | DiscussionOnVOUnits : Discussion on specific aspects of the document. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD-VOUnits-v0.3-20110508.pdf 2011 May 08 draft IVOA Note minor update
WD-VOUnits-v0.2-20090522.pdf 2009 May 22 draft IVOA Note
2009 March Draft IVOA working draft
ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18
OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : !!!
LatestWD-VOUnits-v0.3-20110508.pdf 2011 May 08 draft IVOA Note minor update WD-VOUnits-v0.2-20090522.pdf 2009 May 22 draft IVOA Note 2009 March Draft IVOA working draft ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers <--
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | !!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | !!! Work in progress : !!! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | WD-VOUnits-v0.3-20110508.pdf 2011 May 08 draft IVOA Note minor update | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD-VOUnits-v0.2-20090522.pdf 2009 May 22 draft IVOA Note
2009 March Draft IVOA working draft
ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18
OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers <--
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
LatestWD-VOUnits-v0.2-20090522.pdf 2009 May 22 draft IVOA Note 2009 March Draft IVOA working draft ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
Latest | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Draft IVOA working draft about to be updated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | WD-VOUnits-v0.2-20090522.pdf 2009 May 22 draft IVOA Note | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | 2009 March Draft IVOA working draft | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18
OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers <--
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Latest | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Draft IVOA working draft | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Draft IVOA working draft about to be updated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
ImplicationsForADQL 2009Mar18
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
OldUnitsPage
Main IvoaDataModel page
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 UnitsMir_fichiers <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Draft IVOA working draft | ||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Draft IVOA working draft | ||||||||||||||||||||
OldUnitsPage
Main IvoaDataModel page
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||
> > | UnitsMir_fichiers | ||||||||||||||||||||
<--
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
Draft IVOA working draft OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
| |||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
Draft IVOA working draft OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
Draft IVOA working draft OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
| |||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||
| |||||||||
Added: | |||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
Draft IVOA working draft OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
Draft IVOA working draft OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
| |||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||
| |||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
Draft IVOA working draft OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
| |||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||
| |||||||||
Added: | |||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Draft IVOA working draft | |||||||
OldUnitsPage
Main IvoaDataModel page
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!! | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
OldUnitsPage | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Main IvoaDataModel page | |||||||
> > | Main IvoaDataModel page | |||||||
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008 | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Use cases
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
OldUnitsPage Main IvoaDataModel page GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services.Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Use cases | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74.
| |||||||
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
OldUnitsPage | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Main IvoaDataModel page | |||||||
Goal | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | This workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services | |||||||
> > | This workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services. | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | The main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). | |||||||
Existing Documents
RecommendationsAs discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008
Use cases
Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74.
Interactions with other WG effortsIVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 <--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | OldUnitsPage
| |||||||
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | Recommendations | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | From IVOA Trieste 2008 May 19. | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
Previous discussion/links to existing libraries of units ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
| |||||||
Existing Documents | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Action: There are few instances of multiple legitimate names for the same unit (benign). There may be a very few instances of the same name for different units e.g. k could be kilo- or Boltzmann's constant, but this could be solved by adopting a syntax for separating prefixes v. different components of multiple units. IVOA units must be machine readable which makes parts of the IAU system unsuitable since they use Greek letters, diacritical marks etc. However it seems to me that a schema could be written which combined CDS and HEASARC and STC as unambigious alternatives and this would be much quicker than trying to modify existing data. | |||||||
> > | Recommendations | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | We should make sure that tools for extracting metadata from FITS is consistent with this (is there a need for transation from FITS keywords). This is the point where custom exensions to software could correctly interpret errors like the infamous ISO Watts. | |||||||
> > | As discussed at IVOA, Trieste, May 2008 | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Existing or new tools and LibrariesWhere are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. | |||||||
> > | Use cases
| |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities
SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS. | |||||||
Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | Cone, S?AP, registry searches | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | The current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsNeed precise unit definitions Examples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers (?). We do need to be able to recognise them.
Enabling convenient image displayUse case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) and to allow easy conversions e.g. Jy arcsec-2 to Jy sr-1 (JP Leahy).Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistency. Request for dimensional analysis tools/library to be available.Services with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
| |||||||
Interactions with other WG efforts | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | IVOA.AnitaRichards - 16 Jun 2008 | |||||||
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). RecommendationsFrom IVOA Trieste 2008 May 19.
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Previous discussion/links to existing libraries of units ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Existing or new tools and LibrariesWhere are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsNeed precise unit definitions Examples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers (?). We do need to be able to recognise them.
Enabling convenient image displayUse case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) and to allow easy conversions e.g. Jy arcsec-2 to Jy sr-1 (JP Leahy).Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistency. Request for dimensional analysis tools/library to be available.Services with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG efforts<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Updated IVOA Trieste 2008 May 19. | |||||||
> > | Recommendations | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. | |||||||
> > | From IVOA Trieste 2008 May 19. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
Previous discussion/links to existing libraries of units | |||||||
ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Existing or new tools and LibrariesWhere are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsNeed precise unit definitions Examples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers (?). We do need to be able to recognise them.
Enabling convenient image displayUse case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) and to allow easy conversions e.g. Jy arcsec-2 to Jy sr-1 (JP Leahy).Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistency. Request for dimensional analysis tools/library to be available.Services with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG efforts<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). Updated IVOA Trieste 2008 May 19. The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Action: Can we agree to adopt e.g. IAU units with alternatives where needed - there are relatively few instances of multiple legitimate names for the same unit (benign). There are a very few instances of the same name for different units, is there some way to adopt the most likely default but issue a warning? Or are all such instances so obscure that they can just produce a warning for human intervention? | |||||||
> > | Action: There are few instances of multiple legitimate names for the same unit (benign). There may be a very few instances of the same name for different units e.g. k could be kilo- or Boltzmann's constant, but this could be solved by adopting a syntax for separating prefixes v. different components of multiple units. IVOA units must be machine readable which makes parts of the IAU system unsuitable since they use Greek letters, diacritical marks etc. However it seems to me that a schema could be written which combined CDS and HEASARC and STC as unambigious alternatives and this would be much quicker than trying to modify existing data. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | We should make sure that tools for extracting metadata from FITS is consistent with this (is there a need for transation from FITS keywords). This is the point where custom exensions to software could correctly interpret errors like the infamous ISO Watts. | |||||||
Existing or new tools and LibrariesWhere are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsNeed precise unit definitions Examples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers (?). We do need to be able to recognise them.
Enabling convenient image displayUse case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) and to allow easy conversions e.g. Jy arcsec-2 to Jy sr-1 (JP Leahy).Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistency. Request for dimensional analysis tools/library to be available.Services with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG efforts<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Updated IVOA Trieste 2008 May 19. | |||||||
The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement.
ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Action: Can we agree to adopt e.g. CDS units with alternatives where needed - there are relatively few instances of multiple legitimate names for the same unit (benign). There are a very few instances of the same name for different units, is there some way to adopt the most likely default but issue a warning? Or are all such instances so obscure that they can just produce a warning for human intervention? | |||||||
> > | Action: Can we agree to adopt e.g. IAU units with alternatives where needed - there are relatively few instances of multiple legitimate names for the same unit (benign). There are a very few instances of the same name for different units, is there some way to adopt the most likely default but issue a warning? Or are all such instances so obscure that they can just produce a warning for human intervention? | |||||||
Existing or new tools and LibrariesWhere are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsNeed precise unit definitions Examples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers (?). We do need to be able to recognise them.
Enabling convenient image displayUse case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) and to allow easy conversions e.g. Jy arcsec-2 to Jy sr-1 (JP Leahy).Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistency. Request for dimensional analysis tools/library to be available.Services with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG efforts<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Action: Can we agree to adopt e.g. CDS units with alternatives where needed - there are relatively few instances of multiple legitimate names for the same unit (benign). There are a very few instances of the same name for different units, is there some way to adopt the most likely default but issue a warning? Or are all such instances so obscure that they can just produce a warning for human intervention?
Existing or new tools and Libraries | |||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion tools | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Need precise unit definitions | |||||||
Examples include:
Database queries | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | We have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them. | |||||||
> > | We have no control over the units used by data providers (?). We do need to be able to recognise them. | |||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Image (etc.) display | |||||||
> > | Actually we can have influence - e.g. through Euro-VO DCA - at least to remind people to adhere to appropriate 'local' standard e.g. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Use case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) Details? (JP Leahy). | |||||||
> > | Enabling convenient image display | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Use case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) and to allow easy conversions e.g. Jy arcsec-2 to Jy sr-1 (JP Leahy). | |||||||
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec) | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistency | |||||||
> > | Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistency. Request for dimensional analysis tools/library to be available. | |||||||
Services with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG efforts<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
Image (etc.) displayUse case: Need a library to support displaying images with coordinates in sensible units (i.e. using SI multiple etc.) Details? (JP Leahy). | |||||||
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG efforts<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. | |||||||
> > | Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. | |||||||
Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG efforts | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
Requirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...] | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
<--
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
<--
| |||||||
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS.Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | cf SPECFIND SED construction | |||||||
> > |
SPECFIND : A tool to extract cross-identifications and radio continuum spectra from radio catalogues contained in the VIZIER database of the CDS. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Reference: SPECFIND Catalog of radio continuum spectra Authors: Vollmer, B.; Davoust, E.; Dubois, P.; Genova, F.; Ochsenbein, F.; van Driel, W. Publication: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VIII/74. | |||||||
Cone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities cf SPECFIND SED constructionCone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Interactions with other WG efforts | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Requirements from other groups
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | | |||||||
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities cf SPECFIND SED constructionCone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities cf SPECFIND SED constructionCone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities cf SPECFIND SED constructionCone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities cf SPECFIND SED constructionCone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!!
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesThe main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. ApproachHow do we find out what are VO priorities?
Existing Documents | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities cf SPECFIND SED constructionCone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
Results and Feedback
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!! | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | The main discussion will be initiated at the Interop meeting 2007 27 Sep (Cambridge) and recorded in the DM forum and on this page, but if necessary we will use email between a small group to thrash out details (as for Characterisation). | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | The material below is a starting point for discussion; I apologise if I have omitted existing efforts, please add references and/or a brief outline. Nothing so far below is policy, just ideas for criticism/replacement. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Charter
| |||||||
> > | Approach | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | How do we find out what are VO priorities?
| |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | Existing Documents | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Where are units needed?Construction of Spectral Energy DistributionsThe use of units and interconversions has been well-developed e.g. in VOSpec and YAFIT, but consistency is due to the cooperation of the individuals involved. A model for units would recognise this effort and allow it to be applied more widely. TAP - source catalogue DM - need to compare quantities cf SPECFIND SED constructionCone, S?AP, registry searchesThe current IVOA standards mandate units, but in some cases this repeatedly leads to problems e.g..
Conversion toolsExamples include:
Database queriesWe have no control over the units used by data providers. We do need to be able to recognise them.
Lessons so farDimensional approach (see VOSpec)Automated dimensional analysis could be an easy way to check for consistencyServices with mandated unitsMany data publishers install VO services on top of existing archives in arbitrary units. We can't expect the astronomical users to know what that is so e.g. SIAP search areas are always supposed to be in decimal degrees, but this often comes unstuck if data are in other units. What is best:
ConversionsIt is important to define the limits of accuracy e.g.
| |||||||
Results and Feedback
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | Working Documents
More documentation
| |||||||
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage!!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!! | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Goal | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | This workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units with astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services | |||||||
> > | This workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units for astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO services | |||||||
Charter
Results and Feedback
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Working Documents | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
More documentation
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | !!! Work in progress : Site under re construction !!! | |||||||
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units with astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesCharter
Results and Feedback
Working Documents
More documentation
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|
IVOA DM Work Package : Units description and usage
GoalThis workpage is meant to record the general practice in manipulating units with astronomical data and define a simple way to homogeneise their representation within VO servicesCharter
Results and Feedback
Working Documents
More documentation
Interactions with other WG effortsRequirements from other groups
Conclusions[Under construction...]<--
<--
|