From the discussion, and the proposals I made to some of the items, it follows we might need the following new UCDs:
-
meta.bib.doi
, for supporting DOI-based bibliographical references; not very needed, if the corresponding field only allows for bibcodes. This would be used for field bib_reference
.
-
pos.uv
, for specifying a UV-plane axis, and pos.uv.u
and pos.uv.v
for specifying a locus in the UV plane. This would be used for field s_ucd
, and in general for fields with UType Char.SpatialAxis.UCD.
-
arith.fft
, for qualifying a UCD as being subject to a FFT transform. This would be used for field em_axis
(for instance, em.freq; arith.fft
for an autocorrelation series), or for field s_ucd
, if instead of pos.uv
, pos.eq; arith.fft
were preferred.
-
arith.log
, for qualifying a UCD as being subject to a logarithmic transform. This would be used for field em_axis
(for instance, em.wl; arith.log
; this use case comes from the SSA Recommendation)
This topic: IVOA
> WebHome >
IvoaDataModel >
ObsDMCoreComponents >
ObsTAPdraftDiscussion > ObsTAPdraftDiscussionNewUCDs
Topic revision: r1 - 2011-03-07 - JuanDeDiosSantanderVela