VOResourceV110RFC < IVOA

---++  Resource Metadata RFC

This document will act as *RFC* centre for the [[http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/PR/ResMetadata/RM-20051115.html][Resource Metadata v1.1 Proposed Recommendation]].

In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your TWiki.WikiName so authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.

Discussion about any of the comments or responses should be conducted on the virtual observatory query language mailing list, registry@ivoa.net.

---++ Community Comments
   * First sample comment (by %MAINWEB%.MarcoLeoni): ...
      * Response (by _authorname_): ... 
---
   * Second sample comment (): ...



---++ Comments from the Technical Coordination Group

TWG members should add their comments under their name.  The deadline for comments is 27 Oct 2006. 

*Note:*  RM v1.01 is a REC already; see sect. 7 for summary of changes since then.

---+++ Marc Allen (Applications IG)

_please edit_

---+++ Francoise Genova (Data Curation &amp; Preservation IG)

_please edit_

---+++ Bob Hanisch (Standards & Documentation WG)

_please edit_

---+++ Gerard Lemson (Theory IG)

_please edit_

---+++ Jonathan <nop>McDowell (Data Models WG)

In section 3.2, I don't like the idea that there is
Creator and Creator.Logo. I'd like these fields to be the
utypes of the data model for RM, and that would be cleaner
if you either change Creator to Creator.Name or change
Creator.Logo to CreatorLogo (no dot).

You have ReferenceURL which must be a URL, but I think there
also ought to be a ReferenceBibcode and I don't see one.

I realize these technical comments are late, and I will
approve the rec even if you choose not to adopt them.


---+++ Reagan Moore (Data Curation &amp; Preservation IG)

I did not see a place in the SDSS example for listing the current release number (DR5).  Is there a way to specify the version of the sky survey easily?  A second question is how to simply define whether a resource is online or offline?  The format field example was not clear.  Is a separate identifier needed?  Finally there are a few minor questions:  
For the identifier "Type", define the term EPO
For the indentifier "facility", theoretical data is more typically associated with a project than the compute resource where they generated the simulation.  Perhaps the "instrument" for theoretical data is the name of the compute resource.

I approve the recommendation even if these minor changes are not incorporated.

---+++ Francois Ochsenbein (VOTable WG)

_please edit_

---+++ Pedro Osuna (VOQL WG)

_please edit_

---+++ Ray Plante (Resource Registry WG)

_Submitting Chair:_  no comments.

---+++ Andrea Priete-Martinez (Semantics WG)

I approve.

---+++ Guy Rixon (Grid &amp; Web Services WG)

_please edit_

---+++ Doug Tody (Data Access Layer WG)

_please edit_

---+++ Nic Walton (GGF Astro-RG)

_please edit_

---+++ Roy Williams (VOEvent WG)

In section 3.2, for Contact information, I think there should be a place for telephone number. Also, I think multiple telephone numbers and emails should be allowed. This is because VOEvent schema clones the Contact schema from RM, and in that case it would be crucial to be able to contact the author of an event.

Once this change is made, I would add my vote for Recommendation.
This topic: IVOA > WebHome > IvoaResReg > VOResourceV110RFC
Topic revision: r8 - 2006-10-23 - ReaganMoore