Who should have the power to define new messages?anyone - individuals, development projects, standards bodies, communities, the messaging fabric shouldn't care about the content of messages. However, folk should be encouraged to use existing messages where sensible - and as it's in their own interest to, this shouldn't be hard - which implies that a message vocabulary needs to be available somewhere -- NoelWinstanley Anyone. But documentation of messages should be paramount. Messages should be centrally documented, including what applications support which messages -- BrunoRino - 09 Feb 2007 |
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
<--
Who should have the power to define new messages?anyone - individuals, development projects, standards bodies, communities, the messaging fabric shouldn't care about the content of messages. However, folk should be encouraged to use existing messages where sensible - and as it's in their own interest to, this shouldn't be hard - which implies that a message vocabulary needs to be available somewhere -- NoelWinstanley | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Anyone. But documentation of messages should be paramount. Messages should be centrally documented, including what applications support which messages -- BrunoRino - 09 Feb 2007 | |||||||
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
<--
Who should have the power to define new messages? | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | anyone - individuals, development projects, standards bodies, communities, the messaging fabric shouldn't care about the content of messages. However, folk should be encouraged to use existing messages where sensible - and as it's in their own interest to, this shouldn't be hard - which implies that a message vocabulary needs to be available somewhere -- NoelWinstanley | |||||||
<--
Who should have the power to define new messages? |