Difference: ApplicationsMessagingInitialQuestionsTwo (2 vs. 3)
Revision 32012-06-26 - root
Which set of platforms/languages should be able to access the messaging system?Fortran and other legacy codes might easily be able to create a message with a given syntax regardless of the transport method used. One use case to consider is that of an existing F77 theory code that might easily be modified to display table/image results using this system. --Mike Platforms: Windows XP, Mac OSX, Linux. That is, all the desktop platforms in common use. This might seem obvious, but it eliminates some Unix-only solutions. Languages/environments: for clients, at least C#, C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, TCL, IDL. Fortran would be nice. (Of course, with a wire protocol like XMLRPC, we'll get many other languages "for free"). -- JohnTaylor - 08 Feb 2007 |
View topic | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | More topic actions...
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback