Although the goal of this message is not to report on that meeting, we do need to note a few points:
Timeline
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Running meeting(2x/02/2021)
| |||||||
> > | Running meeting(25/02/2021)
| |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > | DM meeting - Workshop preparation - collective remarks and minutes Participants 15
The purpose of this meeting is to prepare the DM workshop forseen in April 2021: Workshop goals LM presents the goal of the meeting. Preparation of meeting on data models on VO and how to improve consensus on data modeling generation. Some DMs work well but disagreements on how to match models with scientific quantities. Proposal to solve mapping problems is MANGO, developed by LM Also, proposal from Tom D. to organize a workshop on how to solve this gap Proposed process to prepare the workshop Gather a list of concrete use cases and possible solutions Gather contributions
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
The dm-usecases repository These use cases is created compiling some VO historical use cases that require data modeling Two folders per use case, raw_data with an annotated xml and another folder with a mango proposal fulfilling the use case Time line for contribution to the use cases repository is during March to allow the pull requests merging of all the contributions poll created on use cases portal: FB: Procedure is to create a branch and ask for a pull request to be merged by LM? yes, either for commenting existing or creating a new use case TM: Lack of consensus are, in my view, due to the level of implementation of the solutions LM: I contacted Mark T. about using data models in Topcat and the problem comes from heteregeneous data modeling annotations in VOTables FG: It is difficult to decide whether to implement before having an idea of the work required to implement This means that the point has to be central to the workshop using the use cases MD: Will implement. If it works for VizieR, it will work for him. TM: Use case for proper motion representation? LM: Yes, in astrometry Mark CD: Orbital models not present, a new use case is needed MD: Not clear if we need models for quantities as this could be solved just with UCDs FB: UCDs are standalone, DM informs about quantities. MD: physics: UCDs, use DM to annotate GL: Mango enables to link two different quantities together, no need to have a specific model for each case. Workshop conduct virtual / in person ? Proposal and decision for a Date
| |||||||
Although the goal of this message is not to report on that meeting, we do need to note a few points:
Timeline
Running meeting(2x/02/2021)
|