Will Extension schema need to go through IVOA process?Many groups are now considering extension schema for the registry, so that specialized metadata can be added. To what extent should IVOA be standardizing these registry extensions? How can we encourage flexibility and innovation, but also ensure future interoperability? RayPlante comments: I'm not sure I understand this as an issue. As chair of the Registry Working Group, I would answer your questions as follows:
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
If you disagree with these statements, feel they are understated, or otherwise feel they don't tell the whole story, please co-sponsor this issue.
Comment by ChristopheArviset
This Topic has not been co-sponsored, and comments have been given by Ray Plante on the question, so it will not go to the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document. |
Will Extension schema need to go through IVOA process?Many groups are now considering extension schema for the registry, so that specialized metadata can be added. To what extent should IVOA be standardizing these registry extensions? How can we encourage flexibility and innovation, but also ensure future interoperability? RayPlante comments: I'm not sure I understand this as an issue. As chair of the Registry Working Group, I would answer your questions as follows:
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | Comment by ChristopheArviset | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | This Topic has not been co-sponsored, and comments have been given by Ray Plante on the question, so it will not go to the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document. | |||||||
<--
|
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Will Extension schema need to go through IVOA process?Many groups are now considering extension schema for the registry, so that specialized metadata can be added. To what extent should IVOA be standardizing these registry extensions? How can we encourage flexibility and innovation, but also ensure future interoperability? | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | RayPlante comments: I'm not sure I understand this as an issue. As chair of the Registry Working Group, I would answer your questions as follows:
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | If you disagree with these statements, feel they are understated, or otherwise feel they don't tell the whole story, please co-sponsor this issue. | |||||||
<--
|
Will Extension schema need to go through IVOA process?Many groups are now considering extension schema for the registry, so that specialized metadata can be added. To what extent should IVOA be standardizing these registry extensions? How can we encourage flexibility and innovation, but also ensure future interoperability?<--
|