Difference: IVOATheorySimDBRegistry (2 vs. 3)

Revision 32009-05-26 - RayPlante

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IVOATheorySimDB"
(back to main)
Added:
>
>

The SimDB-Registry Connection

 Here we discuss the relations between SimDB and the Registry.
Added:
>
>

Questions to consider

 
  • How should a SimDB be registered?
  • SimDB/Resource is not equivalent to Registry/Resource, but has clear correspondences. Should these be made "formal" in some way, for example using UTYPEs.
  • Some SimDB/Resources could/should be registered in a registry as well. This is one motivation for SimDB/Project for example. Can this be postponed to later version?
  • In view of previous point, can SimDB be seen as an "extension registry"? Should this be formalised (in a later version)?
  • What can SimDB learn from registry efforts regarding:
    • allowing (and specifying ?) upload of new resource-s
    • harvesting
    • use of references to other existing, registered resources (unsing IVO Identifiers).
    • query interfaces
  • other ...
Added:
>
>

Discovery Use Cases and Requirements

The common ground between SimDB and Registries is in discovering of data and services.

 


(back to main)

<--  
-->
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback