Difference: ProgramPrep (34 vs. 35)

Revision 352018-11-05 - JanetEvans

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaTCG"

Program Prep List - College Park - last updated - Oct12

(Move the request from 'New Request' to 'Scheduled' once it's been added to the Program)

Program link: http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/InterOpNov2018

Rooms:

  • Salon 1,2,3=Terrapin - holds 168 - Start/End Plenary
  • Salon 1&2 holds 112
  • Salon 3 holds 56

New Requests:

Changed:
<
<
  • It looks like the timing supports combining Registry with the proposed Apps2 session, to also include a Python session. So can we change the Saturday 9am "Registry" session to "Registry/Apps2/Python, and delete the proposed Apps2(...) session? - Tom and Theresa (11/1)
  • (impossible) request: is there a way to avoid also Theory clashing DAL? As parenthetically started... -- MarcoMolinaro - 2018-11-02
>
>
Scheduled: (Last update - 10/29)
Deleted:
<
<

Scheduled: (Last update - 10/29)

 
  • Seeded rooms and added Exec session - JE (10/18)
  • Seeded 2018B Roadmap and posted - JE (10/19)
  • Sent notes to TCG - Program requests by COB Thu (10/25) - JE (10/23)
  • Early Schedule will be filled in - 10/26 - currently 14 requests id'd above/annotated in BOLD - JE (10/25)
  • 1st schedule round - moved request to scheduled JD (10/25)
    • [DAL/GWS/Registry] DAL, GWS and Registry will need a joint session to discuss authenticated endpoints - MarcoMolinaro - Oct12
    • potential extension also to Apps, i.e. take care to avoid clashes -- MarcoMolinaro - 2018-10-25
    • [DAL1, DAL2] (at least) 1 DAL specific session is required, may be more, pending contributions -- MarcoMolinaro - 2018-10-15
      • update: DAL would prefer to have 2 sessions, to allow for enough discussion time. The second session may be dropped if the Interop schedule gets too packed -- MarcoMolinaro - 2018-10-24
        • re-update: DAL requires 2 sessions, the second one to allow also for overflow discussion from the joint session -- MarcoMolinaro - 2018-10-25
    • [GWS] Not a lot of contributed presentations yet for GWS, so probably just one dedicated session this time. We often see them come in late so we'll keep the TCG informed. -- BrianMajor - 2018-10-15
    • [OPS] Ops would like one session -- TomMcGlynn - 2018-10-16
    • [Theory] One session for the Theory IG (better if it does not overlap Semantics, DM or KDD sessions)-- CarlosRodrigo - 2018-10-17
    • [DM, DM/Provenance] DM: It is looking like we will need 2 sessions (1=General, 2=Provenance); and will contribute to a joint TDIG/DM session -- MarkCresitelloDittmar - 2018-10-23
    • [APPS] Apps: We currently have content for 1 full session. Likely we will get more requests, so would look for either a second session or a shared session with another group. -- TomDonaldson - 2018-10-23
    • [TDIG/DM] TDIG: A total of 5 contributions so far, one session shoud be ok -- AdaNebot - 2018-10-29
    • [SSIG] SSIG: Same as TDIG, not so many contribution at this time, so one session will be fine. -- BaptisteCecconi - 2018-10-24
    • [Semantics] Semantics got few suggestions for talks. One session only, and if agreed with Theory a join session could also fit in order to tackle the distribution of SKOS theory's vocabulary. I check with them. Possibly not in // to DM, DAL, TD. thanks Mireille -- MireilleLouys - 2018-10-24.
      • it turns out there are much topics for theory , so there will be no common session and Semantics shoud have its own , (suits in a small room) -- MireilleLouys - 2018-10-26.
    • [Registry] Registry: beyond the joint session, we should have one general for a talk on MOCs in the registry and validator results/maintainer issues. This can be in the smallest room. -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-24
  • 2nd round - JD (10/26)
    • Super minor: can you just rename the DM sessions DM1 & DM2 -- MarkCresitelloDittmar - 2018-10-26
    • [DCP] We will have at least 3 presentations and a discussion around DOIs. One session will be perfect - AndreSchaaff - 2018-10-26
  • 3rd round - JD (10/29)
    • Can we move the TDIG so that it doesn't overlap with the SSIG session. We expect a number of people will want to attend both sessions. -- DaveMorris - 2018-10-29
    • Would it be possible to swap DAL/GWS/Registry with DAL1? -- MarcoMolinaro - 2018-10-29
    • [Apps2] Added an App2 (left a note that they were willing to share the session - perhaps with new protocols
    • Would it be possible to avoid having Theory at the same time than DM or Semantics?
Added:
>
>
  • 4th round - JD (11/04)
    • It looks like the timing supports combining Registry with the proposed Apps2 session, to also include a Python session. So can we change the Saturday 9am "Registry" session to "Registry/Apps2/Python, and delete the proposed Apps2(...) session? - Tom and Theresa (11/1)
    • (impossible) request: is there a way to avoid also Theory clashing DAL? As parenthetically started... -- MarcoMolinaro - 2018-11-02
      • Sorry Marco ... too many dependencies to support this request (JE)
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback