Registry Interfaces 1.1 Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsPublic discusion page for the IVOA Registry Interfaces 1.1 Proposed Recommendation The latest version of the RI 1.1 specification can be found at: http://www.ivoa.net/documents/RegistryInterface/20170201/ In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your WikiName so authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment. Discussion about any of the comments or responses should be conducted on the registry mailing list, registry@ivoa.net . However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document.Comments from the IVOA Community and TCG members during RFC period: 2017-02-07 - 2017-03-07Comments from Mark Taylor | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | Document looks clear, and I support moving to a version that drops the SOAP-based client interfaces. I fixed some extremely minor typos in volute. One question (just curiosity really): what's the reason for introducing the new requirement for time granularity at the level of seconds that's mentioned in section 2.7? -- MarkTaylor - 2017-03-08 | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Document looks clear, and I support moving to a version that drops the SOAP-based client interfaces. I fixed some extremely minor typos in volute. One question (just curiosity really): what's the reason for introducing the new requirement for time granularity at the level of seconds that's mentioned in section 2.7? -- MarkTaylor - 2017-03-08
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Registry, unsurprisingly, approves. -- MarkusDemleitner - 2017-04-04 | |||||||
Semantics Working GroupEducation Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupOperations Interest Group |