Difference: RegistryTelecon2019A (1 vs. 2)

Revision 22019-06-14 - TheresaDower

 
META TOPICPARENT name="2019ARoadmap"
Changed:
<
<
Agenda:
>
>

Teleconference via Harvard-Smithsonian Webex, 2019-06-13

Added:
>
>
Attendees:

Christophe Arviset, Markus Demleitner, Theresa Dower, Juan Gonzales, Costas Vrioni, (Menelaus Perdikas, Yulie and Peter, RofR)

Actions

  • Follow up on XSD versions for # in identifiers fix: Markus, Theresa, Peter
  • Finish validation fixes for STScI Registry: Theresa
  • Determine where RofR is pulling "full searchable registry" or not, as updated for RI1.1, to get DaCHS back in: Yulie, Markus
  • Update VOResource 1.1 copy used by RofR: any RofR maintainer
  • RofR - set up to run confict checker, re-harvest, and validator on agreed cadence: RofR maintainers

Agenda and Notes:

 

Updates on validation status from College Park 2018 Interop to Paris 2019 Interop.
* Basic validation status, what has changed, been fixed, etc?
* What, if anything still needs to be done for perfect validation?
These reports from:
* Euro-VO full searchable registry

- Fully validated. Passes RofR validation.

Changed:
<
<
- Changes to registry resource.
>
>
- New Portal: http://evor-int.esac.esa.int/evor/
  - Remaining issues - how to update automatically? What cadence?

* STScI full searchable registry

- Major improvements made. Still does not pass. Hoping for July/August 2019.

* DaCHS? (not currently listed as full.)

- Not currently listed. Where does RofR get "full" list from?

- Markus: needs to re-register as full in a way that counts as full for RofR

- RofR gets their listing based on another capability than RegTAP?

- Yulie and Theresa and Markus - sort out by email after telecon


* Report from RofR and from the Euro-VO report: Note resolved and/or continuing issues BETWEEN registries, i.e. with conflicting authorities.

- Resolved: 1 found in April 2019 and resolved. Conflict checker run at RofR, no new conflicts found as of 2019-06-12



Updates from RofR
* registry self-identification records

- April, harvested all regardless of validation status

- Tools exist for harvesting all registries. No automated pipeline (yet).

- Remaining questions: How often should we validate all registries? Send validation automatically report or no? Only records that validate?

- Markus: proposing reharvest registry self-ID every day but validate less often? Because validation of an entire registry is expensive but harvesting ID record is fast.

- Yulie: in case of connection issues / missing documents: follow up by hand, don't automatically remove anything. Re-harvest weekly to start. Can run conflict checker more often (daily).

- Menelaus: currently doing just before the interop.


* What, if any, updates were made to extra validation rules

- additional resource validations beyond XSD. Action to RofR: add to RofR page somewhere before next interop or validation report.

* What, if any, updates were made to standards records as included in the RofR

- VOResource 1.1 copy in RofR needs updated.

- Action on Markus: put newest VOResource 1.1 on document repository.

- RofR needs to change how it looks for full searchable registries to match RI 1.1. (Action on Peter codewise. Yulie, Theresa, Markus, Peter follow up by email)


Validation update re # in identifiers issue.
* IdentifierURI - should STAY reference to resource record. without #

* TapRegExt anyURI - there is an errata for allowing anyURI (i.e. allownig #) in places where the # has been a conflict

* Action on Theresa: start email thread - Markus, Peter, Yulie, etc: what newest document/standard/xsd versions in sync will make this problem go away.

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback