Difference: ResourceIdentifier (1 vs. 12)

Revision 122018-12-04 - TheresaDower

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"

Resource Identifiers

Specifications

Changed:
<
<
IVOA Recommendation (Pending)
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.12 (RayPlante, Editor)
>
>
IVOA Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v2.0 (MarkusDemleitner, Editor)
 
Changed:
<
<
IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1 (RayPlante, Editor)
>
>
Development of this standard is tracked via the IVOA Documents landing page.
 
Deleted:
<
<
Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page.
 

Discussion

Added:
>
>
 Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
Changed:
<
<
... ... ... ...
>
>
... ... ... ...
 


Added:
>
>
 Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003
Deleted:
<
<

 
Changed:
<
<

>
>

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="" date="1172827190" name="Identifiers-20070302.html" path="Identifiers-20070302.html" size="46924" user="RayPlante" version="1.2"

Revision 112012-06-26 - root

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"

Resource Identifiers

Specifications

Changed:
<
<
IVOA Recommendation (Pending)
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.12 (RayPlante, Editor)
>
>
IVOA Recommendation (Pending)
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.12 (RayPlante, Editor)
 
Changed:
<
<
IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1 (RayPlante, Editor)
>
>
IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1 (RayPlante, Editor)
  Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page.

Discussion

Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Changed:
<
<
Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003
>
>
Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003
 


IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See Documents for details.


META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="" date="1172827190" name="Identifiers-20070302.html" path="Identifiers-20070302.html" size="46924" user="RayPlante" version="1.2"

Revision 102007-03-02 - RayPlante

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"

Resource Identifiers

Specifications

IVOA Recommendation (Pending)
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.12 (RayPlante, Editor)

IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1 (RayPlante, Editor)

Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page.

Discussion

Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003


IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See Documents for details.


<--  
-->
Changed:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="" date="1172825920" name="Identifiers-20070302.html" path="Identifiers-20070302.html" size="46883" user="RayPlante" version="1.1"
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="" date="1172827190" name="Identifiers-20070302.html" path="Identifiers-20070302.html" size="46924" user="RayPlante" version="1.2"
 

Revision 92007-03-02 - RayPlante

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"

Resource Identifiers

Specifications

Changed:
<
<
IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1 (RayPlante, Editor)
>
>
IVOA Recommendation (Pending)
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.12 (RayPlante, Editor)
 
Added:
>
>
IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1 (RayPlante, Editor)
 Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page.

Discussion

Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003


IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See Documents for details.


<--  
-->
Added:
>
>
 
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="" date="1172825920" name="Identifiers-20070302.html" path="Identifiers-20070302.html" size="46883" user="RayPlante" version="1.1"
 

Revision 82005-03-11 - MarcoLeoni

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"

Resource Identifiers

Specifications

Added:
>
>
IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1 (RayPlante, Editor)
 
Deleted:
<
<
IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1
RayPlante, Editor
 Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page.

Discussion

Deleted:
<
<
 Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Changed:
<
<
Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003
>
>
Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003
 


IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See Documents for details.


<--  
-->

Revision 72004-06-24 - MarcoLeoni

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"

Resource Identifiers

Specifications

IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1
RayPlante, Editor

Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page.

Discussion

Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003
Deleted:
<
<
 
Deleted:
<
<
-- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003
 
Added:
>
>

 

IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

Changed:
<
<
An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See /twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHomeDocuments for details.
>
>
An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See Documents for details.
 
Deleted:
<
<
-- RayPlante - 15 Oct 2003
 

Added:
>
>

 
<--  
-->

Revision 62004-06-22 - RayPlante

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"
Changed:
<
<
Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003


-- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003

IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See /twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHomeDocuments for details.

-- RayPlante - 15 Oct 2003

<--  
-->
>
>

Resource Identifiers

Specifications

IVOA Proposed Recommendation
"IVOA Identifiers" v1.1
RayPlante, Editor

Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page.

Discussion

Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003


-- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003

IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

Added:
>
>
An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See /twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHomeDocuments for details.

-- RayPlante - 15 Oct 2003

<--  
-->
 

Revision 52003-10-15 - MarcoLeoni

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"
Deleted:
<
<
(created by TonyLinde 08.12.2022@13:48:41)


 Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003


-- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003

IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

Changed:
<
<
An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See /twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome/Documents for details.
>
>
An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See /twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHomeDocuments for details.
  -- RayPlante - 15 Oct 2003
Added:
>
>
 
<--  
-->

Revision 42003-10-15 - RayPlante

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"
(created by TonyLinde 08.12.2022@13:48:41)


Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>


Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003


-- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003
Added:
>
>

IVOA Identifiers Working Draft

An identifier specification is currently moving through the IVOA Standardization process. See /twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome/Documents for details.

-- RayPlante - 15 Oct 2003

 
<--  
-->

Revision 32003-01-27 - TonyLinde

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"
(created by TonyLinde 08.12.2022@13:48:41)


Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>

Added:
>
>

Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003


 -- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003

<--  
-->

Revision 22003-01-26 - MarcoLeoni

Changed:
<
<
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaRegistry"
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaResReg"
Deleted:
<
<
 (created by TonyLinde 08.12.2022@13:48:41)


Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>

-- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003

<--  
-->

Revision 12003-01-25 - TonyLinde

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaRegistry"

(created by TonyLinde 08.12.2022@13:48:41)


Do we need this standard?

Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:


<resourceIdentifier>
   <name>...</name>
   <resourceType>...</resourceType>
   <location>
      <url>...</url>
      ...
   </location>
</resourceIdentifier>

-- TonyLinde - 24 Jan 2003

<--  
-->
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2022 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback