
Resource IdentifiersSpecifications | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > | Development of this standard is tracked via the IVOA Documents landing page. | |||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < | Development of this standard is tracked via the RWP03Specs page. | |||||||
Discussion | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | ||||||||
Do we need this standard?
Any resource requires a standard subset of metadata to specify its identity, presumably an xml document fragment, eg:
<resourceIdentifier> | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | | |||||||
| > > | | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | ||||||||
| Should the identifier for a resource simply be a URI with the other stuff above being part of the ResourceMetadata? -- TonyLinde - 27 Jan 2003 | ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | ||||||||
| > > | ||||||||
| ||||||||