Difference: SSO20RFC (2 vs. 3)

META TOPICPARENT	name="IvoaGridAndWebServices"

SSO v2.0 Proposed Recommendation: Request for Comments

Public discussion page for the IVOA SSO 2.0 Proposed Recommendation.

The latest version of the SSO Specification can be found at:

Added:

>
>

Are there authenticated services already described in the VO registry ? and if yes, is it already in use ? Can we considered it as a reference implementation ? And in fact, do we have reference implementations ?
Author list and editor lists seems to not follow the current usage of IVOA. It is a little bit strange to have all the Grid and Web service group as authors, and 3 editors. Maybe it opens the question concerning the method to keep knowledge of successive editors.
I wonder if all complementary sections (short introduction to each authentication method) are really relevant in an IVOA standard. I would suggest to put all normative points in a dedicated section and move all explanation of existing authoritative methods in an general non normative section, or as an appendix.
The structuration of section 3 could be modified for avoiding the section 3.1 alone item.
Appendix A must have a short introduction to explain what is this long XML schema. The title "VOResource SecurityMethod extract" is definitively not clear.
must, may, shall... should be in uppercase in normative sections.

Typos:

-- PierreFernique - 2015-11-01

<-- Uncomment when TCG Review period starts

WG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any and formally indicate if they approve or do not approve of the Standard.

IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, although their inputs are not compulsory.

-->

<-- 
 
 
 Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME = TWikiAdminGroup
 
 
-->