Request for Comment: StandardsRegExt v1.0This document serves as the RFC center for the Proposed Recommendation entitled "StandardsRegExt: a VOResource Schema Extension for Describing IVOA Standards, Version 1.0". The specification can be found at http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/StandardsRegExt/20110316/PR-StandardsRegExt-1.0-20110323.html. RFC Review period: 14 Apr 2011 -- 14 May 2011. In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your WikiName so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment. Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the Resource Registry mailing list, registry@ivoa.net. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this documentNotes on Implementations and ValidatersThe StandardsRegExt page includes three compliant sample VOResource instances that use the StandardsRegExt extension. Instances can be validated with an XML Schema validater such as the one provided with Junx (which is based on Xerxes).Comments from the communityComments from MarkTaylorThis document looks mostly good, and the StandardKeyEnumeration element in particular is a useful tool. I have a few comments and corrections:
Comments from TheresaDower | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | A meta-comment, perhaps. Are there and should there be plans for an IVOA-maintained RegistryOfRegistries-included publishing registry for physically storing these standards resources as they are written? I can see some benefit in various registries' pretty-print resource views being able to display these as linked from the resources of the standards types they describe. | |||||||
> > | A meta-comment, perhaps. Are there and should there be plans for an IVOA-maintained Registry-of-Registries-included publishing registry for physically storing these standards resources as they are written? I can see some benefit in various registries' pretty-print resource views being able to display these as linked from the resources of the standards types they describe. | |||||||
-- TheresaDower - 12 May 2011 | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
<--
|