Difference: TCGTopicsStandarsAcrossWG (1 vs. 6)

Revision 62012-06-26 - root

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaTCG"

Standards across various WGs

Text to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document

There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over more than one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP).

Within the TCG and with the Standing Committee on Standards and Processes, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.

End of Text




Revision 52008-06-25 - ChristopheArviset

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaTCG"

Standards across various WGs

Text to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document

There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over more than one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP).

Changed:
<
<
Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.
>
>
Within the TCG and with the Standing Committee on Standards and Processes, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.
  End of Text




<--  
-->

Revision 42008-06-23 - SeverinGaudet

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaTCG"

Standards across various WGs

Text to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document

Changed:
<
<
There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP).
>
>
There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over more than one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP).
  Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.

End of Text




<--  
-->

Revision 32008-06-23 - ChristopheArviset

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaTCG"

Standards across various WGs

Deleted:
<
<
There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB).
 
Added:
>
>
Text to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document

There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP).

 Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.
Added:
>
>
End of Text



 


<--  
-->

Revision 22008-05-26 - ChristopheArviset

Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaTCG"
 

Standards across various WGs

There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB).

Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.


<--  
-->

Revision 12008-05-26 - ChristopheArviset

 

Standards across various WGs

There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB).

Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.


<--  
-->
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback