VOTable 1.4 Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsSummaryLatest Draft: VOTable 1.4 (Proposed Recommendation) The main purpose of VOTable 1.4 is to support the new TIMESYS element. VOTable 1.4 is a backward-compatible revision whose primary purpose is to support a new TIMESYS element. For more information on TIMESYS, see this note: A Proposal for a TIMESYS Element in VOTable The other main differences between version 1.4 of VOTable and the preceding version 1.3 are:
• Applying erratum VOTable 1.3-1, un-deprecating COOSYS.
Changes made during the Working Draft phase are noted here: VOTable 1.4 Working Draft Notes• Applying erratum VOTable 1.3-2, permitting F0 in precision. • Applying erratum VOTable 1.3-3, clarifying the meaning of arraysize="1". | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Update (2019-06-11): New PR Document uploaded to correct document date and status. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FutureThe VOTableInfo page contains a list of proposed changes that, during the WD phase, were agreed to defer to a future version. When the document maintenance is transitioned to GitHub, those item will be converted to GitHub issues.Reference Interoperable Implementations
Implementations Validators
Comments Prior to Official RFC PeriodClosed on 2019-06-04 with no comments -- TomDonaldson - 2019-06-04Comments from the IVOA Community during RFC/TCG review period: 2019-06-05 - 2019-07-19 The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section. In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment. Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
Comments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: 2019-06-05 - 2019-07-19 WG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment. IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory. TCG Chair & Vice ChairApplications Working GroupData Access Layer Working GroupData Model Working GroupGrid & Web Services Working GroupRegistry Working GroupApproved from Registry standpoint. I don't have the background to comment deeply on TIMESYS details, but it looks straightforward to implement if needed and the parallel with COOSYS fits nicely. A note on the arraysize=1 clarification: since we're no longer working in the confines of smallest possible text changes for errata, there might be places elsewhere in the text where arraysize is discussed where it would be helpful to mention. Not strictly necessary to address this, just a thought. -- TheresaDower - 2019-06-04Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : 2019-06-05 - 2019-07-19If you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<--
|