Difference: SODA-1_0-Err-1 (1 vs. 8)

Revision 82019-05-12 - MarcoMolinaro

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"

Server-side Operations for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

Author: Marco Molinaro

Date last changed: 2019-04-18

Changed:
<
<
<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->
>
>
Date accepted: 2019-05-12
 

Rationale

The SODA (version 1.0) protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed.

Three-factor semantics (Name, UCD, Unit) was mainly thought for interpretation of custom parameters in service descriptors. In the case of a parameter that is part of a standard, like the above SODA ID, the definition of the parameter is unambiguous. However a 3-factor description is still useful for homegeneity and comparison to other parameters.

The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.

To remedy the situation we propose here to use meta.id;meta.dataset instead. This achieves:

  • typo amendment;
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization;
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator;
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification.

Erratum Content

This Erratum proposes the following changes.

ID description

In §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA-1.0, update the UCD in the sentence

The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

to

meta.id;meta.dataset

Three-factor tables

In §3.5 "*Three-Factor Semantics*" change the UCD value for the ID parameter in Tables 3 & 4 from from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation

to

meta.id;meta.dataset

SODA sync service descriptor example

In the example in §4 "*Integration of Service Capabilities*" change the ID PARAM from

<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.ref.url;meta.curation" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>

to

<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.id;meta.dataset" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>

Impact Assessment

Being the UCD is only used in SODA to uniquely describe the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it).

On the client side, changing a UCD will break clients using 3-factor semantics to find the parameter to pass the identifier in. However, as ID is defined by both Datalink and SODA and no competing definition ever existed, no known client actually uses 3-factor semantics to locate the ID parameter and instead just uses the hard-coded name ID. Hence, to our knowledge the UCD changed here is ignored by clients, and no breakage will occur.

The safety of changing this UCD is also plausible in view of the fact that several data centers (e.g., GAVO's Heidelberg data center; example here) have been successfully operating SODA services that used meta.id;meta.main as a UCD for ID without interoperabilty issues.

<--  
-->

Revision 72019-05-11 - JamesDempsey

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"

Server-side Operations for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

Author: Marco Molinaro

Date last changed: 2019-04-18

<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->

Rationale

The SODA (version 1.0) protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed.

Changed:
<
<
Three-factor semantics (Name, UCD, Unit) was meanly thought for interpretation of custom parameters in service descriptors. In the case of a parameter part of a standard, like the above SODA ID, the definition of the parameter is unambiguous. However a 3-factor description is still useful for homegeneity and comparison to other parameters.
>
>
Three-factor semantics (Name, UCD, Unit) was mainly thought for interpretation of custom parameters in service descriptors. In the case of a parameter that is part of a standard, like the above SODA ID, the definition of the parameter is unambiguous. However a 3-factor description is still useful for homegeneity and comparison to other parameters.
  The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as
meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.

To remedy the situation we propose here to use meta.id;meta.dataset instead. This achieves:

  • typo amendment;
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization;
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator;
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification.

Erratum Content

This Erratum proposes the following changes.

ID description

In §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA-1.0, update the UCD in the sentence

The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

to

meta.id;meta.dataset

Three-factor tables

In §3.5 "*Three-Factor Semantics*" change the UCD value for the ID parameter in Tables 3 & 4 from from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation

to

meta.id;meta.dataset

SODA sync service descriptor example

In the example in §4 "*Integration of Service Capabilities*" change the ID PARAM from

<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.ref.url;meta.curation" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>

to

<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.id;meta.dataset" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>

Impact Assessment

Changed:
<
<
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it).
>
>
Being the UCD is only used in SODA to uniquely describe the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it).
  On the client side, changing a UCD will break clients using 3-factor semantics to find the parameter to pass the identifier in. However, as ID is defined by both Datalink and SODA and no competing definition ever existed, no known client actually uses 3-factor semantics to locate the ID parameter and instead just uses the hard-coded name ID. Hence, to our knowledge the UCD changed here is ignored by clients, and no breakage will occur.

The safety of changing this UCD is also plausible in view of the fact that several data centers (e.g., GAVO's Heidelberg data center; example here) have been successfully operating SODA services that used meta.id;meta.main as a UCD for ID without interoperabilty issues.

<--  
-->

Revision 62019-05-07 - PatrickDowler

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"
Changed:
<
<

Server-side Opertaion for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

>
>

Server-side Operations for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

  Author: Marco Molinaro

Date last changed: 2019-04-18

<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->

Rationale

Changed:
<
<
The SODA (version 1.0) protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed.
>
>
The SODA (version 1.0) protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed.
 
Changed:
<
<
Three-factor semantics (Name, UCD, Unit) was meanly thought for interpretation of custom parameters in service descriptors.
>
>
Three-factor semantics (Name, UCD, Unit) was meanly thought for interpretation of custom parameters in service descriptors. In the case of a parameter part of a standard, like the above SODA ID, the definition of the parameter is unambiguous. However a 3-factor description is still useful for homegeneity and comparison to other parameters.
Deleted:
<
<
In the case of a parameter part of a standard, like the above SODA ID, the definition of the parameter is unambiguous. However a 3-factor description is still useful for homegeneity and comparison to other parameters.
  The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as
meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.

To remedy the situation we propose here to use meta.id;meta.dataset instead. This achieves:

  • typo amendment;
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization;
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator;
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification.

Erratum Content

This Erratum proposes the following changes.

ID description

Added:
>
>
 In §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA-1.0, update the UCD in the sentence
The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
Added:
>
>
 from
meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
Added:
>
>
 to
meta.id;meta.dataset

Three-factor tables

Changed:
<
<
In §3.5 "*Three-Factor Semantics*" change the UCD value for the ID parameter in Tables 3 & 4 from from
>
>
In §3.5 "*Three-Factor Semantics*" change the UCD value for the ID parameter in Tables 3 & 4 from from
 
meta.ref.url;meta.curation
Added:
>
>
 to
meta.id;meta.dataset

SODA sync service descriptor example

Added:
>
>
 In the example in §4 "*Integration of Service Capabilities*" change the ID PARAM from
<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.ref.url;meta.curation" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>
Added:
>
>
 to
<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.id;meta.dataset" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>

Impact Assessment

Changed:
<
<
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it).
>
>
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it).
 
Changed:
<
<
On the client side, changing a UCD will break clients using 3-factor
>
>
On the client side, changing a UCD will break clients using 3-factor semantics to find the parameter to pass the identifier in. However, as ID is defined by both Datalink and SODA and no competing definition ever existed, no known client actually uses 3-factor semantics to locate the ID parameter and instead just uses the hard-coded name ID. Hence, to our knowledge the UCD changed here is ignored by clients, and no breakage will occur.
Deleted:
<
<
semantics to find the parameter to pass the identifier in. However, as ID is defined by both Datalink and SODA and no competing definition ever existed, no known client actually uses 3-factor semantics to locate the ID parameter and instead just uses the hard-coded name ID. Hence, to our knowledge the UCD changed here is ignored by clients, and no breakage will occur.
 
Changed:
<
<
The safety of changing this UCD is also plausible in view of the
>
>
The safety of changing this UCD is also plausible in view of the fact that several data centers (e.g., GAVO's Heidelberg data center; example here) have been successfully operating SODA services that used meta.id;meta.main as a UCD for ID without interoperabilty issues.
Deleted:
<
<
fact that several data centers (e.g., GAVO's Heidelberg data center; example here) have been successfully operating SODA services that used meta.id;meta.main as a UCD for ID without interoperabilty issues.
 
<--  
-->

Revision 52019-04-18 - MarcoMolinaro

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"

Server-side Opertaion for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

Author: Marco Molinaro

Changed:
<
<
Date last changed: 2019-04-17
>
>
Date last changed: 2019-04-18
 
<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->

Rationale

Changed:
<
<
SODA protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed. The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as
>
>
The SODA (version 1.0) protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed.
Added:
>
>
Three-factor semantics (Name, UCD, Unit) was meanly thought for interpretation of custom parameters in service descriptors. In the case of a parameter part of a standard, like the above SODA ID, the definition of the parameter is unambiguous. However a 3-factor description is still useful for homegeneity and comparison to other parameters.

The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as

 
meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.

To remedy the situation we propose here to use meta.id;meta.dataset instead. This achieves:

  • typo amendment;
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization;
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator;
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification.

Erratum Content

Changed:
<
<
This Erratum proposes to change, in §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA - Version 1.0, the UCD in the sentence
>
>
This Erratum proposes the following changes.
Deleted:
<
<
The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
 
Added:
>
>

ID description

In §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA-1.0, update the UCD in the sentence
The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
 from
Deleted:
<
<
 
meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
Added:
>
>
to
meta.id;meta.dataset
 
Added:
>
>

Three-factor tables

In §3.5 "*Three-Factor Semantics*" change the UCD value for the ID parameter in Tables 3 & 4 from from
meta.ref.url;meta.curation
 to
Added:
>
>
meta.id;meta.dataset
 
Changed:
<
<
meta.id;meta.dataset
.
>
>

SODA sync service descriptor example

Added:
>
>
In the example in §4 "*Integration of Service Capabilities*" change the ID PARAM from
<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.ref.url;meta.curation" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>
to
<PARAM name="ID" 
                ucd="meta.id;meta.dataset" 
                ref="idcolumn-ref" 
                datatype="char" arraysize="*" value="" >
    <DESCRIPTION>The publisher DID of the dataset of interest</DESCRIPTION>
</PARAM>
 

Impact Assessment

Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it).

On the client side, changing a UCD will break clients using 3-factor semantics to find the parameter to pass the identifier in. However, as ID is defined by both Datalink and SODA and no competing definition ever existed, no known client actually uses 3-factor semantics to locate the ID parameter and instead just uses the hard-coded name ID. Hence, to our knowledge the UCD changed here is ignored by clients, and no breakage will occur.

The safety of changing this UCD is also plausible in view of the fact that several data centers (e.g., GAVO's Heidelberg data center; example here) have been successfully operating SODA services that used meta.id;meta.main as a UCD for ID without interoperabilty issues.

<--  
-->

Revision 42019-04-17 - MarcoMolinaro

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"

Server-side Opertaion for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

Author: Marco Molinaro

Changed:
<
<
Date last changed: 2019-04-16
>
>
Date last changed: 2019-04-17
 
<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->

Rationale

SODA protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed. The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.

Added:
>
>
To remedy the situation we propose here to use meta.id;meta.dataset instead. This achieves:
  • typo amendment;
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization;
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator;
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification.
 

Erratum Content

Changed:
<
<
This Erratum proposes to change, in §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA - Version 1.0 the UCD in the sentence
>
>
This Erratum proposes to change, in §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA - Version 1.0, the UCD in the sentence
 
The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

to

Changed:
<
<
meta.id;meta.dataset
>
>
meta.id;meta.dataset
.
 
Deleted:
<
<
thus achieving:
  • typo amendment
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification
 

Impact Assessment

Changed:
<
<
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it). On the client side it has to be evaluated whether applications need changes. However it has to be noticed that there are few SODA service currently in place (and none registered).
>
>
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it).
Added:
>
>
On the client side, changing a UCD will break clients using 3-factor semantics to find the parameter to pass the identifier in. However, as ID is defined by both Datalink and SODA and no competing definition ever existed, no known client actually uses 3-factor semantics to locate the ID parameter and instead just uses the hard-coded name ID. Hence, to our knowledge the UCD changed here is ignored by clients, and no breakage will occur.

The safety of changing this UCD is also plausible in view of the fact that several data centers (e.g., GAVO's Heidelberg data center; example here) have been successfully operating SODA services that used meta.id;meta.main as a UCD for ID without interoperabilty issues.

 
<--  
-->

Revision 32019-04-17 - JamesDempsey

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"

Server-side Opertaion for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

Author: Marco Molinaro

Date last changed: 2019-04-16

<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->

Rationale

Changed:
<
<
SODA protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed.
>
>
SODA protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed. The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as
Deleted:
<
<
The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as
 
meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
Deleted:
<
<
This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.
 
Added:
>
>
This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.
 

Erratum Content

Changed:
<
<
This Erratum proposes to change, in §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA - Version 1.0
>
>
This Erratum proposes to change, in §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA - Version 1.0 the UCD in the sentence
Deleted:
<
<
the UCD in the sentence
 
The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

to

meta.id;meta.dataset

thus achieving:

  • typo amendment
Changed:
<
<
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization
>
>
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization
 
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification

Impact Assessment

Changed:
<
<
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact
>
>
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment and releasing it). On the client side it has to be evaluated whether applications need changes. However it has to be noticed that there are few SODA service currently in place (and none registered).
Deleted:
<
<
on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment a releasing it). On the client side it has o be evaluated whether applications need changes. However it has to be noticed that there are few SODA service currently in place (and none registered).
 
<--  
-->

Revision 22019-04-16 - MarcoMolinaro

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"

Server-side Opertaion for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

Author: Marco Molinaro

Changed:
<
<
Date last changed: 2019-04-12
>
>
Date last changed: 2019-04-16
 
<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->

Rationale

SODA protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed. The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.

Erratum Content

This Erratum proposes to change, in §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA - Version 1.0 the UCD in the sentence

The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

to

Changed:
<
<
meta.ref.uri;meta.dataset
>
>
meta.id;meta.dataset
 
Changed:
<
<
amending so the typo, the reference to a dataset rather than an organization and using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator. Using meta.id won't work together with meta.ref.uri being both P UCD words.
>
>
thus achieving:
  • typo amendment
Added:
>
>
  • reference to a dataset rather than an organization
  • using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator
  • keeping the identifier opaque as required by the specification
 

Impact Assessment

Changed:
<
<
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change won't probably have any impact on the service provider's side (requiring only a change in the service description). On the client side it has o be evaluated whether applications need
>
>
Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change will have a minimal impact on the service provider's side (requiring the UCD amendment a releasing it). On the client side it has o be evaluated whether applications need
 changes. However it has to be noticed that there are few SODA service currently in place (and none registered).

<--  
-->

Revision 12019-04-12 - MarcoMolinaro

 
META TOPICPARENT name="SODA-1_0-Errata"

Server-side Opertaion for Data Access version 1.0 Proposed Erratum 1: ID parameter UCD amendment

Author: Marco Molinaro

Date last changed: 2019-04-12

<-- Date accepted|rejected: 20NN-MM-DD -->

Rationale

SODA protocol uses the ID parameter to specify opaque identifiers to the dataset or file to be accessed. The UCD specified in the SODA-embedded 3-factor semantics is reported in the REC text as

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA
This is not a valid UCD both for the, probably, typo of the added .SODA part and the fact that meta.curation identifies a man/organization responsible for the data as per the UCD vocabulary.

Erratum Content

This Erratum proposes to change, in §3.2.1 "*ID*" of SODA - Version 1.0 the UCD in the sentence

The UCD describing the ID parameter is meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

from

meta.ref.url;meta.curation.SODA

to

meta.ref.uri;meta.dataset

amending so the typo, the reference to a dataset rather than an organization and using a UCD referring to an identifier rather than a resource locator. Using meta.id won't work together with meta.ref.uri being both P UCD words.

Impact Assessment

Being the UCD only used in SODA to describe uniquely the ID parameter using the 3-factor semantics, this change won't probably have any impact on the service provider's side (requiring only a change in the service description). On the client side it has o be evaluated whether applications need changes. However it has to be noticed that there are few SODA service currently in place (and none registered).

<--  
-->
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback