
| 
 Standards across various WGsText to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over more than one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP). Within the TCG and with the Standing Committee on Standards and Processes, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases. End of Text | 
| 
 Standards across various WGsText to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over more than one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP). | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases. | |||||||
| > > | Within the TCG and with the Standing Committee on Standards and Processes, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases. | |||||||
| End of Text <-- 
 | ||||||||
| 
 Standards across various WGsText to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP). | |||||||
| > > | There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over more than one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP). | |||||||
| Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.
End of Text <-- 
 | ||||||||
| 
 Standards across various WGs | ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < | There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB). | |||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Text to go in the 2008 Assessment and Roadmap document There have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB, SimDAP). | |||||||
| Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases. | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | End of Text | |||||||
| <-- 
 | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | 
 | |||||||
| Standards across various WGsThere have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB). Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.<-- 
 | ||||||||
| Standards across various WGsThere have been several examples of the need to define an IVOA standards that spans over one WG (eg UTYPES, UNITS mentioned in other topics, but also SimDB). Within the TCG and with the Standards and Process Committee, we should discuss and try to define a standard process to deal with these cases.<-- 
 | 
 
  
  Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.