<span style="background-color: transparent;">Agenda:</span> <div id="divtagdefaultwrapper"> Updates on validation status from College Park 2018 Interop to Paris 2019 Interop.<br /> * Basic validation status, what has changed, been fixed, etc?<br /> * What, if anything still needs to be done for perfect validation?<br /> These reports from:<br /> * Euro-VO full searchable registry <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Fully validated. Passes !RofR validation. <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Changes to registry resource. <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Remaining issues - how to update automatically? What cadence? * !STScI full searchable registry <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Major improvements made. Still does not pass. Hoping for July/August 2019. * !DaCHS? (not currently listed as full.) <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Not currently listed. Where does !RofR get "full" list from? <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Markus: needs to re-register as full in a way that counts as full for !RofR <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- !RofR gets their listing based on another capability than !RegTAP? <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Yulie and Theresa and Markus - sort out by email after telecon <br /> * Report from !RofR and from the Euro-VO report: Note resolved and/or continuing issues BETWEEN registries, i.e. with conflicting authorities. - Resolved: 1 found in April 2019 and resolved. Conflict checker run at !RofR, no new conflicts found as of 2019-06-12 <br /> <br /> Updates from !RofR<br /> * registry self-identification records - April, harvested all regardless of validation status - Tools exist for harvesting all registries. No automated pipeline (yet). <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Remaining questions: How often should we validate all registries? Send validation automatically report or no? Only records that validate? <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Markus: proposing reharvest registry self-ID every day but validate less often? Because validation of an entire registry is expensive but harvesting ID record is fast. <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Yulie: in case of connection issues / missing documents: follow up by hand, don't automatically remove anything. Re-harvest weekly to start. Can run conflict checker more often (daily). <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Menelaus: currently doing just before the interop. <br /> * What, if any, updates were made to extra validation rules <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- additional resource validations beyond XSD. Action to !RofR: add to !RofR page somewhere before next interop or validation report.<br /><br /> * What, if any, updates were made to standards records as included in the !RofR <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- VOResource 1.1 copy in !RofR needs updated. <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Action on Markus: put newest VOResource 1.1 on document repository. <span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- !RofR needs to change how it looks for full searchable registries to match RI 1.1. (Action on Peter codewise. Yulie, Theresa, Markus, Peter follow up by email) <br /> Validation update re # in identifiers issue.<br /> * !IdentifierURI - should STAY reference to resource record. without # * !TapRegExt anyURI - there is an errata for allowing anyURI (i.e. allownig #) in places where the # has been a conflict * Action on Theresa: start email thread - Markus, Peter, Yulie, etc: what newest document/standard/xsd versions in sync will make this problem go away. </div>
This topic: IVOA
>
WebHome
>
IvoaTCG
>
2019ARoadmap
>
RegistryTelecon2019A
Topic revision: r1 - 2019-06-13 - TheresaDower
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback