IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications
Data Access Layer
![]() ![]() Data Model | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | PhotDM 1.0 | |||||||
> > | PhotDMv1-1 1.0 | |||||||
TCG review started on July 2012. | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. | |||||||
> > | Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDMv1-1 was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) | |||||||
> > | It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDMv1-1 with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach | |||||||
> > | PhotDMv1-1 will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach | |||||||
Spectral DM 2.0
"Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process
Characterization DM 2.0
Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process
Image DM
Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified
VO-DML
Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interops
Grid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt has become a REC. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt is currently being finalized for metadata inputs with the VOEvent mailing list group. Matthew Graham is coordinating this effort. The RWG will participate in the RFC process to evaluate the specification in context of the registry standards integration. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface 2.0 (RI-2) working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review and is pending revisions for progression to the next phase for RFC. Our RWG goal for this standard is to move forward into the REC process following review and coordination during the May 2014 interop meeting. RI-2 will retain the standard OAI protocol for Publishing Registry and harvesting from the Publishing registry into the Fully Searchable Registry. This RI-2 standard will deprecate the the earlier SOAP interface support and provide 2 forms of web based REST interfaces, APIs, for the application client community: a TAP protocol based on the RegTAP relational registry model standard, and a SimpleRegREST interface. The later is the key to completion of this updated standard registry interface definition. A consolidated approach based on the integration of the Simple REST prototype via the EuroVO registry and VAO registry REST interface will be proposed. This standard RFC process is a high priority topic of discussion for the May 2014 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is currently beginning the RFC phase. Registry Metadata for Footprints The RWG will continue to have discussions and evolve the current standards infrastructure in support of metadata for footprint descriptions, i.e. spatial regions of coverage. The advancement in the MOC and STC/s standards definition will be evaluated in the context of footprint representation for support of applications in development of data discovery. Future coordination between IVOA groups will involve potential development for spatial indexing in support of application integration with registry collections. Registry Operations and Curation The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 12 February 2014 last updateSemanticsThe WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.* Extension of the UCD List for planetary data: There are requirements from the Planetary community to use and extend the IVOA UCD list for using these semantic tags while mapping their metadata. Some concepts , current in Planetary science are missing . An effort to propose new possible UCD strings and validate them in the IVOA UCD maintenance group is taking place . Proposed list by May Interop 2014 Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2014-02-11Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications
Data Access Layer
![]() ![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt has become a REC. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt is currently being finalized for metadata inputs with the VOEvent mailing list group. Matthew Graham is coordinating this effort. The RWG will participate in the RFC process to evaluate the specification in context of the registry standards integration. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface 2.0 (RI-2) working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review and is pending revisions for progression to the next phase for RFC. Our RWG goal for this standard is to move forward into the REC process following review and coordination during the May 2014 interop meeting. RI-2 will retain the standard OAI protocol for Publishing Registry and harvesting from the Publishing registry into the Fully Searchable Registry. This RI-2 standard will deprecate the the earlier SOAP interface support and provide 2 forms of web based REST interfaces, APIs, for the application client community: a TAP protocol based on the RegTAP relational registry model standard, and a SimpleRegREST interface. The later is the key to completion of this updated standard registry interface definition. A consolidated approach based on the integration of the Simple REST prototype via the EuroVO registry and VAO registry REST interface will be proposed. This standard RFC process is a high priority topic of discussion for the May 2014 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is currently beginning the RFC phase. Registry Metadata for Footprints The RWG will continue to have discussions and evolve the current standards infrastructure in support of metadata for footprint descriptions, i.e. spatial regions of coverage. The advancement in the MOC and STC/s standards definition will be evaluated in the context of footprint representation for support of applications in development of data discovery. Future coordination between IVOA groups will involve potential development for spatial indexing in support of application integration with registry collections. Registry Operations and Curation The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 12 February 2014 last updateSemanticsThe WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.* Extension of the UCD List for planetary data: There are requirements from the Planetary community to use and extend the IVOA UCD list for using these semantic tags while mapping their metadata. Some concepts , current in Planetary science are missing . An effort to propose new possible UCD strings and validate them in the IVOA UCD maintenance group is taking place . Proposed list by May Interop 2014 | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Data Curation & Preservation | |||||||
> > | Data Curation & Preservation | |||||||
The IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2014-02-11Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications
Data Access Layer
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ![]() | |||||||
> > | ![]() | |||||||
The DAL roadmap is simplified to include the capabilities: DataLink, SIA query, SIA metadata (get-gory-details), and accessData (from DAL) as well as dependencies on the DM-WG for ObsCore and imageDM. We expect several versions of SIA-2.x and AccessData-1.x to be produced before all use cases are satisfied.
![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt has become a REC. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt is currently being finalized for metadata inputs with the VOEvent mailing list group. Matthew Graham is coordinating this effort. The RWG will participate in the RFC process to evaluate the specification in context of the registry standards integration. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface 2.0 (RI-2) working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review and is pending revisions for progression to the next phase for RFC. Our RWG goal for this standard is to move forward into the REC process following review and coordination during the May 2014 interop meeting. RI-2 will retain the standard OAI protocol for Publishing Registry and harvesting from the Publishing registry into the Fully Searchable Registry. This RI-2 standard will deprecate the the earlier SOAP interface support and provide 2 forms of web based REST interfaces, APIs, for the application client community: a TAP protocol based on the RegTAP relational registry model standard, and a SimpleRegREST interface. The later is the key to completion of this updated standard registry interface definition. A consolidated approach based on the integration of the Simple REST prototype via the EuroVO registry and VAO registry REST interface will be proposed. This standard RFC process is a high priority topic of discussion for the May 2014 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is currently beginning the RFC phase. Registry Metadata for Footprints The RWG will continue to have discussions and evolve the current standards infrastructure in support of metadata for footprint descriptions, i.e. spatial regions of coverage. The advancement in the MOC and STC/s standards definition will be evaluated in the context of footprint representation for support of applications in development of data discovery. Future coordination between IVOA groups will involve potential development for spatial indexing in support of application integration with registry collections. Registry Operations and Curation The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 12 February 2014 last updateSemantics | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | The Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. | |||||||
The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate. | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | * Extension of the UCD List for planetary data: There are requirements from the Planetary community to use and extend the IVOA UCD list for using these semantic tags while mapping their metadata. Some concepts , current in Planetary science are missing . An effort to propose new possible UCD strings and validate them in the IVOA UCD maintenance group is taking place . Proposed list by May Interop 2014 | |||||||
Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2014-02-11Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Data Access Layer
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ![]() | |||||||
> > | ![]() | |||||||
The DAL roadmap is simplified to include the capabilities: DataLink, SIA query, SIA metadata (get-gory-details), and accessData (from DAL) as well as dependencies on the DM-WG for ObsCore and imageDM. We expect several versions of SIA-2.x and AccessData-1.x to be produced before all use cases are satisfied.
![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL: | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt has become a REC. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt is currently being finalized for metadata inputs with the VOEvent mailing list group. Matthew Graham is coordinating this effort. The RWG will participate in the RFC process to evaluate the specification in context of the registry standards integration. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface 2.0 (RI-2) working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review and is pending revisions for progression to the next phase for RFC. Our RWG goal for this standard is to move forward into the REC process following review and coordination during the May 2014 interop meeting. RI-2 will retain the standard OAI protocol for Publishing Registry and harvesting from the Publishing registry into the Fully Searchable Registry. This RI-2 standard will deprecate the the earlier SOAP interface support and provide 2 forms of web based REST interfaces, APIs, for the application client community: a TAP protocol based on the RegTAP relational registry model standard, and a SimpleRegREST interface. The later is the key to completion of this updated standard registry interface definition. A consolidated approach based on the integration of the Simple REST prototype via the EuroVO registry and VAO registry REST interface will be proposed. This standard RFC process is a high priority topic of discussion for the May 2014 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is currently beginning the RFC phase. Registry Metadata for Footprints The RWG will continue to have discussions and evolve the current standards infrastructure in support of metadata for footprint descriptions, i.e. spatial regions of coverage. The advancement in the MOC and STC/s standards definition will be evaluated in the context of footprint representation for support of applications in development of data discovery. Future coordination between IVOA groups will involve potential development for spatial indexing in support of application integration with registry collections. Registry Operations and Curation The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 12 February 2014 last updateSemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2014-02-11Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Data Access Layer
![]() ![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt has become a REC. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt is currently being finalized for metadata inputs with the VOEvent mailing list group. Matthew Graham is coordinating this effort. The RWG will participate in the RFC process to evaluate the specification in context of the registry standards integration. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface 2.0 (RI-2) working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review and is pending revisions for progression to the next phase for RFC. Our RWG goal for this standard is to move forward into the REC process following review and coordination during the May 2014 interop meeting. RI-2 will retain the standard OAI protocol for Publishing Registry and harvesting from the Publishing registry into the Fully Searchable Registry. This RI-2 standard will deprecate the the earlier SOAP interface support and provide 2 forms of web based REST interfaces, APIs, for the application client community: a TAP protocol based on the RegTAP relational registry model standard, and a SimpleRegREST interface. The later is the key to completion of this updated standard registry interface definition. A consolidated approach based on the integration of the Simple REST prototype via the EuroVO registry and VAO registry REST interface will be proposed. This standard RFC process is a high priority topic of discussion for the May 2014 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is currently beginning the RFC phase. Registry Metadata for Footprints The RWG will continue to have discussions and evolve the current standards infrastructure in support of metadata for footprint descriptions, i.e. spatial regions of coverage. The advancement in the MOC and STC/s standards definition will be evaluated in the context of footprint representation for support of applications in development of data discovery. Future coordination between IVOA groups will involve potential development for spatial indexing in support of application integration with registry collections. Registry Operations and Curation The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 12 February 2014 last updateSemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2014-02-11Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications
Data Access Layer
![]() ![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval. | |||||||
> > | SimpleDALRegExt has become a REC. | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | StandardsRegExt 1.0 Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations. | |||||||
VOEventRegExt | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension. | |||||||
> > | In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt is currently being finalized for metadata inputs with the VOEvent mailing list group. Matthew Graham is coordinating this effort. The RWG will participate in the RFC process to evaluate the specification in context of the registry standards integration. | |||||||
Registry Interface and RegTAP | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. | |||||||
> > | The RegistryInterface 2.0 (RI-2) working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review and is pending revisions for progression to the next phase for RFC. Our RWG goal for this standard is to move forward into the REC process following review and coordination during the May 2014 interop meeting. RI-2 will retain the standard OAI protocol for Publishing Registry and harvesting from the Publishing registry into the Fully Searchable Registry. This RI-2 standard will deprecate the the earlier SOAP interface support and provide 2 forms of web based REST interfaces, APIs, for the application client community: a TAP protocol based on the RegTAP relational registry model standard, and a SimpleRegREST interface. The later is the key to completion of this updated standard registry interface definition. A consolidated approach based on the integration of the Simple REST prototype via the EuroVO registry and VAO registry REST interface will be proposed. This standard RFC process is a high priority topic of discussion for the May 2014 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft. | |||||||
> > | An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is currently beginning the RFC phase. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Other Registry Development | |||||||
> > | Registry Metadata for Footprints | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. | |||||||
> > | The RWG will continue to have discussions and evolve the current standards infrastructure in support of metadata for footprint descriptions, i.e. spatial regions of coverage. The advancement in the MOC and STC/s standards definition will be evaluated in the context of footprint representation for support of applications in development of data discovery. Future coordination between IVOA groups will involve potential development for spatial indexing in support of application integration with registry collections. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013 | |||||||
> > | Registry Operations and Curation | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 12 February 2014 last update | |||||||
SemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2014-02-11Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications
Data Access Layer
![]() ![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval. StandardsRegExt 1.0 Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft. Other Registry Development The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013SemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time Domain | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. | |||||||
> > | The TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. | |||||||
-- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | -- JohnSwinbank - 2013-06-01 | |||||||
> > | -- JohnSwinbank - 2014-02-11 | |||||||
Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | Following discussions between authors a PR has been submitted for publication in January 2014, for an RFC to start in February. If all goes smoothly, we hope to achieve REC status near the May 2014 interop. | |||||||
Data Access Layer
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
![]() | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ![]() | |||||||
> > | The DAL roadmap is simplified to include the capabilities: DataLink, SIA query, SIA metadata (get-gory-details), and accessData (from DAL) as well as dependencies on the DM-WG for ObsCore and imageDM. We expect several versions of SIA-2.x and AccessData-1.x to be produced before all use cases are satisfied. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ![]() | |||||||
Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval. StandardsRegExt 1.0 Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft. Other Registry Development The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013SemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2013-06-01Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Following discussions between authors a stable WD MOC-1.0-WD-20130910 has been issued. This will be promoted to PR and an RFC called shortly after the Hawaii interop. If all goes smoothly, we hope to achieve REC status near the May 2014 interop. | |||||||
> > | Following discussions between authors a PR has been submitted for publication in January 2014, for an RFC to start in February. If all goes smoothly, we hope to achieve REC status near the May 2014 interop. | |||||||
Data Access Layer
![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval. StandardsRegExt 1.0 Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft. Other Registry Development The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013SemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2013-06-01Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops.Applications | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > | Following discussions between authors a stable WD MOC-1.0-WD-20130910 has been issued. This will be promoted to PR and an RFC called shortly after the Hawaii interop. If all goes smoothly, we hope to achieve REC status near the May 2014 interop. | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
Data Access Layer
![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval. StandardsRegExt 1.0 Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft. Other Registry Development The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013SemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2013-06-01Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013B | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | This outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013 after the Hawaii Interop. | |||||||
> > | This outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013/14 between the Hawaii and Madrid Interops. | |||||||
Applications
Data Access Layer
![]() Data ModelPhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interopsGrid and Web Sevices* PDL:
RegistrySimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval. StandardsRegExt 1.0 Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft. Other Registry Development The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013SemanticsThe Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.Data Curation & PreservationThe IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheoryThe main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.EducationThe newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25Time DomainThe newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 -- JohnSwinbank - 2013-06-01Standard and ProcessesNo evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.Science PrioritiesScience priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.<--
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013 after the Hawaii Interop.Applications | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Data Access Layer | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < |
![]() | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ![]() | |||||||
Data Model | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
PhotDM 1.0 TCG review started on July 2012. Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team. It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop) PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach Spectral DM 2.0 "Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process Characterization DM 2.0 Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process Image DM Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified VO-DML Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interops | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Grid and Web Sevices | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | * PDL: | |||||||
> > | * PDL: | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Registry | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
SimpleDALRegExt 1.0 SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval. StandardsRegExt 1.0 Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations. VOEventRegExt In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension. Registry Interface and RegTAP The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency. An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft. Other Registry Development | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013 | |||||||
> > | The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. | |||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | Semantics | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
> > | -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013 | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Semantics | |||||||
The Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups. | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate. | |||||||
> > | The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Data Curation & Preservation | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
The IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include:
| ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | -- AlbertoAccomazzi - 2013-03-19 | |||||||
> > | -- AlbertoAccomazzi - 2013-03-19 | |||||||
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheory | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
The main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data. From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G. Search for simulations Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team. Extraction of data Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink. | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document. | |||||||
> > | Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Education | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25 | |||||||
> > | The newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25 | |||||||
Time Domain | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 | |||||||
> > | The newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09 | |||||||
-- JohnSwinbank - 2013-06-01
Standard and Processes | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | No evolution of the standards forseen in 2013. | |||||||
> > | No evolution of the standards forseen in 2013. | |||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | ||||||||
Science Priorities | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Science priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort. | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
|
IVOA Roadmap for 2013BThis outlines the roadmap for development activities by the various IVOA working and interest groups in 2013 after the Hawaii Interop.Applications
Data Access Layer
![]() Data Model
PhotDM 1.0
TCG review started on July 2012.
Work stopped due to coupling with utypes Tiger Team work as PhotDM was intended to be in line with utypes recommendation. Process of adaptation to the ongoing discussions within Tiger Team.
It is decided (12/05/2013 TCG meeting) to decouple both activities, update PhotDM with the comments obtained during TCG review and encourage TCG members to comment on it (to be done before the end of Spring 2013 interop)
PhotDM will be adapted for 2013 Autumn interop following VO-DML approach
Spectral DM 2.0
"Trying to be final" version released to the working group in March 2013. No major comments received. To be presented to WG during Spring 2013 interop. Implementation pending to formally start RFC process
Characterization DM 2.0
Stable version released to the working group in September 2012. No major comments received. Implementation to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Waiting green-light to start RFC process
Image DM
Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Wider list of authors to be identified
VO-DML
Draft to be presented during Spring 2013 interop. Prototypes and comments to be received between Spring and Autumn 2013 interops
Grid and Web Sevices * PDL:
Registry
SimpleDALRegExt 1.0
SimpleDALRegExt is currently in the TCG review. The RWG has incorporated several comments and feedback from the RFC period into the latest version and is still soliciting inputs from the TCG members. The official TCG review period was scheduled to complete January 2013, yet has been extended to collect all the working group inputs through the time of this roadmap draft. The RWG anticipates completion of the TCG review and discussion at the May interop meeting to finalize draft recommendation to the Exec for REC approval.
StandardsRegExt 1.0
Following the standard nomenclature for Registry Extension standard, the StandardsRegExt has become a REC. IVOA standards will be instantiated in this registry extension metadata format and populated in the Registry of Registries central repository as reference implementations.
VOEventRegExt
In the context of VOEvent 2.0, a working draft of the VOEventRegExt was distributed to the RWG for comments and feedback on the standard description. This registry extension will provide VOEvent server and stream discovery. Further work is required to define the capability metadata for this new extension.
Registry Interface and RegTAP
The RegistryInterface (RI) 2.0 working draft has been distributed to the RWG for review. This standard is an technology upgrade from the previous version to include REST web interface for the registry search API. The RWG has agreed to replace the current RI 1.0 SOAP web based protocol using a TAP based service and support a simple registry resource model interface with specifications still in development. This standard is a high priority topic of discussion for the 2013 interoperability meetings with direct impact to IVOA science application tool development that has registry interface dependency.
An underlying Registry relational data model, RegTAP, has been developed which describes the core registry metadata to be exchanged using the RI 2.0 standard interface. This document is in circulation as a RWG working draft.
Other Registry Development
The Registry WG continues to drive regular discussions during Interoperability meetings about IVOA Registries operations, including curation of VO Resources and validation of DAL services. The Registry WG is pending effort to develop a coordinated plan accepted by TCG and proposed to the Exec for developing the procedures and processes of curating nonresponsive or non-valid registered DAL services. This also includes consistency in Registry managed authorities and harvested resource metadata across the IVOA registry network. -- GretchenGreene - 19 March 2013
Semantics
The Semantics WG is participating in ongoing thesaurus/vocabulary efforts in collaboration with the DCP and Theory groups.
The WG will continue to contribute to other WGs and IGs as appropriate.
Data Curation & Preservation
The IG will continue discussions on general topics of interest to the community. Some of the topics we expect to focus on during the next 12 months include: -- AlbertoAccomazzi - 2013-03-19
Knowledge Discovery in DatabasesTheory
The main goal of the Theory I.G. is to propose an access protocol to discover and retrieve simulated data.
From last InterOp, several implementations have been tested. We also had a few teleconferences with some members of the Theory I.G.
Search for simulations
Some technical difficulties have been identified. The most important of them, is that, contrary to an observationnal data, a simulated data may require several thousands quantities to be described in a way allowing us to answer our usecases. Because RDBMS are not efficient with tables with more than thousands columns, the access protocol for theoretical data should not rely on specific technologies (as TAP/RDBMS). During the second Theory session in Heidelberg InterOp we will discuss this important topic. A possible solution, would be to define a few APIs with a main one, the SEARCH/CUTOUT function, to discover interesting simulations. The query language would be a subset of ADQL. On the other hand, the exchange format will have to be defined. We will discuss the oportunity to use the serialization of SimDM in VO-Tables following the proposal of the utype tiger team.
Extraction of data
Concerning the extraction of data, the situation is more simple. Services will provide a Datalink document to describe the possible operations on data. This will be presented and discussed in the common DAL / Theory session about datalink.
Goals of this InterOp for the Theory I.G. are : 1) conclude on a solution to discover simulations that is independent on the technology used to store metadata, 2) define the large picture about the exchange format document in the communication client / server during the search phase of simulations, 3) advance on the syntax of datalink document.
Education
The newly formed Edu IG is planning to discuss its Roadmap during the Heidelberg 2013 Interop. The basis for the discussion are the Terms of Reference that can be read in the IG's web page together with the Rationale. At the Heidelberg Interop, the Edu IG will have both a morning and an afternoon session on Thursday May 16. At least one of the two sessions will be devoted to discussions of the Roadmap and its implementation. Contributions from anybody interested will be most welcome. -- MassimoRamellaINAF - 2013-03-25
Time Domain
The newly formed TDIG is working on a note endorsing SimpleTimeSeries as an IVOA-approved format for time series data and also waiting for feedback from the Registry WG on VOEventRegExt (see above). We anticipate participation in the multi-dimensional data discussions. We will issue an update note covering the VOEvent Transport Protocol, and then push that towwards becoming an IVOA-approved standard. -- MatthewGraham - 2013-05-09
-- JohnSwinbank - 2013-06-01
Standard and Processes
No evolution of the standards forseen in 2013.
Science Priorities
Science priority areas are: Multi-dimensional data, and Time Domain Astronomy. Focus sessions at the May 2013 interop meeting will engage projects and surveys that produce and use multi-dimensional data (including radio astronomy, IFU, high energy and simulation data) and Time Domain data (time series, light curves, transient event reports) in a discussion on the role of VO technologies in these areas. Multi-d and Time Series use cases are being collected as part of this effort.
<--
|