VOTable 1.5 Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsVOTable is a standard for the interchange of data represented as a set of tables, and includes both table metadata and the data itself.SummaryLatest Draft: VOTable 1.5 (Proposed Recommendation) The main purpose of VOTable 1.5 is to supportrefposition attribute analogous to TIMESYS.
VOTable 1.5 is a backward-compatible revision.
The other main differences between version 1.5 of VOTable and the preceding version 1.4 are:
To Do Upon Approval, Prior to Upload
FutureThe VOTable GitHub Issues page contains a list of issues and proposed future enhancements. It is the main mechanism for contributing to the standard.Reference Interoperable ImplementationsDaCHS produces COOSYSrefposition in TAP results from the gaia.dr3lite table in the GAVO Data Center TAP service which can be read by the latest versions of STILTS and TOPCAT. For example:
Implementations Validators
Comments from the IVOA Community during RFC/TCG review period: 2024-April-25 - 2024-June-06The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section. In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment. Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this documentComments from Markus Demleitner, 2024-04-30I have skimmed the diffs from commit c6575888 on (hint: git diff -b is a godsend for that). I have found some minor style issues, for which I have created PR #61 (https://github.com/ivoa-std/VOTable/pull/61). Feel free to discard this if you think it does not improve presentatin. I have one actual question: What about getting MIN/MAX parsing fixed in astropy? This would actually be my favourite reference implementation. Is anyone on it? I'm totally not wild on doing this myself (too much tooling in astropy for my taste), but if there are no other volunteers, I might be talked into putting it in. -- MarkusDemleitner - 2024-04-30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | This is a bug to be fixed later -- AdrianDamian - 2024-06-12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment from L.Michel, 2024-05-02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Is there a way to connect the XSD with the IVOA vocabulary in order to make the system attribute in COOSYS rule machine-readable.This would be very usefull in other contexts (Registry, DM) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Is there a way to connect the XSD with the IVOA vocabulary in order to make the system attribute in COOSYS rule machine-readable.This would be very usefull in other contexts (Registry, DM) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-- LaurentMichel - 2024-05-02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
In short: We can't, because XML Schema does not understand RDF at all, let alone the way we are using it. There is a longer answer: We could define an IVOA-controlled schema extension, where a short piece of software would take a schema "template" and fill out enumerations from vocabularies. Then this thing could update the schemas when the vocabularies change. There is a lot to be said for that. But there is the important counter argument that the schema files would change "on the fly". Whether that is something we want requires a lot of thought. On the other hand, this is not really much of a practical problem; VOTable validators need to check so much more than the XSD compliance, starting with whether the data content somewhat matches the FIELD-s, that doing the vocabulary validation externally is a relatively minor matter. -- MarkusDemleitner - 2024-06-12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments from TCG members during the RFC/TCG Review Period: 2024-April-25 - 2024-June-06WG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment. IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory.TCG Chair & Vice ChairApplications Working GroupData Access Layer Working GroupData Model Working GroupGrid & Web Services Working GroupRegistry Working GroupSemantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery Interest GroupOperations Interest GroupRadio Astronomy Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupStandards and Processes Committee TCG Vote
If you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
|
Group | Yes | No | Abstain | Comments |
TCG | ||||
Apps | ||||
DAL | ||||
DM | ||||
GWS | ||||
Registry | ||||
Semantics | ||||
DCP | ||||
Edu | ||||
KDIG | ||||
Ops | ||||
Radio | ||||
SSIG | ||||
Theory | ||||
TD | ||||
StdProc |