Difference: VocabulariesWorkingArea (1 vs. 11)

Revision 112012-06-26 - root

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

The vocabularies document is in its RFC period, until 10 October 2008

Drafts and issues:

Vocabularies in the document

Issue (vocabset-5) was to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely

  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts ‚Äì namely data types ‚Äì from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.

The resolution of that issue was that all these vocabularies should be included in the document, except IVOA-T, which will have a parallel standardisation process.

-- NormanGray - 12 Sep 2008


META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.90" date="1203017643" name="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" size="60452" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="h" comment="" date="1212153198" name="vocabularies-20080530.htm" path="vocabularies-20080530.htm" size="490942" user="AndreaPreiteMartinez" version="1.1"

Revision 102008-09-12 - NormanGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Added:
>
>
The vocabularies document is in its RFC period, until 10 October 2008
 Drafts and issues:
Changed:
<
<
>
>
Added:
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
 

Vocabularies in the document

Issue (vocabset-5) was to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely

  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
Changed:
<
<
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts – namely data types – from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
>
>
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts ‚Äì namely data types ‚Äì from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
 
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.

The resolution of that issue was that all these vocabularies should be included in the document, except IVOA-T, which will have a parallel standardisation process.

Deleted:
<
<
However, the way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.
 
Deleted:
<
<
So:
vocab in repository? in standard? patron
A&A yes yes AlasdairGray
AOIM yes yes AlasdairGray
IAU93 yes yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
UCD yes yes AlasdairGray
Constellations no yes? RickHessman
AT no no RoyWilliams?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no no ?
 
Changed:
<
<
Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.
>
>
-- NormanGray - 12 Sep 2008
 
Deleted:
<
<
-- NormanGray - 14 Feb 2008
 
Deleted:
<
<
 
<--  
-->
Deleted:
<
<
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.90" date="1203017643" name="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" size="60452" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="h" comment="" date="1212153198" name="vocabularies-20080530.htm" path="vocabularies-20080530.htm" size="490942" user="AndreaPreiteMartinez" version="1.1"

Revision 92008-05-30 - AndreaPreiteMartinez

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Drafts and issues:

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Vocabularies in the document

Issue (vocabset-5) was to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely

  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts – namely data types – from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.

The resolution of that issue was that all these vocabularies should be included in the document, except IVOA-T, which will have a parallel standardisation process.

However, the way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.

So:

vocab in repository? in standard? patron
A&A yes yes AlasdairGray
AOIM yes yes AlasdairGray
IAU93 yes yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
UCD yes yes AlasdairGray
Constellations no yes? RickHessman
AT no no RoyWilliams?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no no ?

Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 14 Feb 2008


<--  
-->
Added:
>
>
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.90" date="1203017643" name="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" size="60452" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="h" comment="" date="1212153198" name="vocabularies-20080530.htm" path="vocabularies-20080530.htm" size="490942" user="AndreaPreiteMartinez" version="1.1"
 

Revision 82008-02-27 - AlasdairGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Drafts and issues:

Vocabularies in the document

Issue (vocabset-5) was to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely

  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts – namely data types – from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.

The resolution of that issue was that all these vocabularies should be included in the document, except IVOA-T, which will have a parallel standardisation process.

However, the way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.

So:

vocab in repository? in standard? patron
A&A yes yes AlasdairGray
Changed:
<
<
AOIM yes yes ?
>
>
AOIM yes yes AlasdairGray
 
IAU93 yes yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
Changed:
<
<
UCD yes ? ?
>
>
UCD yes yes AlasdairGray
 
Constellations no yes? RickHessman
AT no no RoyWilliams?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no no ?

Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 14 Feb 2008


<--  
-->

META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.90" date="1203017643" name="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" size="60452" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"

Revision 72008-02-14 - NormanGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Drafts and issues:

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Vocabularies in the document

Changed:
<
<
One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely
>
>
Issue (vocabset-5) was to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely
 
  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts – namely data types – from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.
Changed:
<
<
The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.
>
>
The resolution of that issue was that all these vocabularies should be included in the document, except IVOA-T, which will have a parallel standardisation process.
 
Added:
>
>
However, the way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.
 So:
vocab in repository? in standard? patron
A&A yes yes AlasdairGray
AOIM yes yes ?
IAU93 yes yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
UCD yes ? ?
Constellations no yes? RickHessman
AT no no RoyWilliams?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no no ?
Changed:
<
<
Is this a good list? Ought there to be more, or fewer? Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.
>
>
Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.
 
Changed:
<
<
-- NormanGray - 05 Feb 2008
>
>
-- NormanGray - 14 Feb 2008
 


<--  
-->
Deleted:
<
<
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.90" date="1203017643" name="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.90.xhtml" size="60452" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
 

Revision 62008-02-14 - AndreaPreiteMartinez

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Added:
>
>
  Drafts and issues:

Vocabularies in the document

One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely

  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts – namely data types – from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.

The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.

So:

vocab in repository? in standard? patron
A&A yes yes AlasdairGray
AOIM yes yes ?
IAU93 yes yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
UCD yes ? ?
Constellations no yes? RickHessman
AT no no RoyWilliams?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no no ?

Is this a good list? Ought there to be more, or fewer? Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 05 Feb 2008


<--  
-->

META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"

Revision 52008-02-10 - NormanGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Drafts and issues:

Vocabularies in the document

One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely

  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts – namely data types – from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.

The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.

So:

vocab in repository? in standard? patron
A&A yes yes AlasdairGray
Changed:
<
<
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
>
>
AOIM yes yes ?
 
IAU93 yes yes AlasdairGray
Added:
>
>
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
 
UCD yes ? ?
Deleted:
<
<
AOIM yes yes ?
 
Constellations no yes? RickHessman
AT no no RoyWilliams?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no no ?

Is this a good list? Ought there to be more, or fewer? Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 05 Feb 2008


<--  
-->

META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"

Revision 42008-02-10 - NormanGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Drafts and issues:

Vocabularies in the document

Changed:
<
<
One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, the 1993 IAU thesaurus, an IVOA Thesaurus based on that, a UCD1+ vocabulary (though there are some questions about whether that's a vocabulary of concepts, or a set of types), and a SKOS version of the list of constellations. There are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.
>
>
One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely
Added:
>
>
  • the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, and the 1993 IAU thesaurus, whose inclusion is as far as I can see completely uncontroversial;
  • an IVOA Thesaurus based on the IAU-93, which may or may not be in this standard depending on whether people would prefer a completely separate process to develop it;
  • a UCD1+ vocabulary (though this deals with a different set of concepts – namely data types – from the other vocabularies and might arguably connect poorly to them); and
  • a SKOS version of the list of constellations, which is very simple, and which might reasonably find a home in this standard on that ground alone.
In addition, there are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). These haven't been SKOSified at all, and Rick's excellent suggestion is that these be left as homework for the VOEvent group.
 
Changed:
<
<
The vocabularies I'm aware of are:
>
>
The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.
 
Changed:
<
<
vocab in repository? patron
A&A yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes Rick
IAU93 yes AlasdairGray
UCD yes ?
AOIM yes ?
Constellations no Rick
AT no Roy?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no ?
>
>
So:
vocab in repository? in standard? patron
A&A yes yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes yes? RickHessman
IAU93 yes yes AlasdairGray
UCD yes ? ?
AOIM yes yes ?
Constellations no yes? RickHessman
AT no no RoyWilliams?
Added:
>
>
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no no ?
  Is this a good list? Ought there to be more, or fewer? Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 05 Feb 2008


<--  
-->

META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"

Revision 32008-02-10 - NormanGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

Changed:
<
<
The current draft of the Vocabularies working draft is at http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ivoa/vocabularies and there's an issues list at http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ivoa/vocabularies/issues
>
>
Drafts and issues:
Added:
>
>
 

Vocabularies in the document

One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, the 1993 IAU thesaurus, an IVOA Thesaurus based on that, a UCD1+ vocabulary (though there are some questions about whether that's a vocabulary of concepts, or a set of types), and a SKOS version of the list of constellations. There are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.

The vocabularies I'm aware of are:

vocab in repository? patron
A&A yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes Rick
IAU93 yes AlasdairGray
UCD yes ?
AOIM yes ?
Constellations no Rick
AT no Roy?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no ?

Is this a good list? Ought there to be more, or fewer? Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 05 Feb 2008


<--  
-->
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" comment="Vocabularies document, v0.04" date="1202667119" name="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" path="vocabularies-0.04.xhtml" size="59574" user="NormanGray" version="1.1"
 

Revision 22008-02-05 - NormanGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

The current draft of the Vocabularies working draft is at http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ivoa/vocabularies and there's an issues list at http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ivoa/vocabularies/issues

Vocabularies in the document

One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, the 1993 IAU thesaurus, an IVOA Thesaurus based on that, a UCD1+ vocabulary (though there are some questions about whether that's a vocabulary of concepts, or a set of types), and a SKOS version of the list of constellations. There are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.

The vocabularies I'm aware of are:

vocab in repository? patron
A&A yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes Rick
IAU93 yes AlasdairGray
UCD yes ?
AOIM yes ?
Changed:
<
<
Constellations yes Rick
>
>
Constellations no Rick
 
AT no Roy?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no ?

Is this a good list? Ought there to be more, or fewer? Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 05 Feb 2008


<--  
-->

Revision 12008-02-05 - NormanGray

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaSemantics"

Vocabularies working area

This is a scratch area for the various ongoing vocabularies projects.

The current draft of the Vocabularies working draft is at http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ivoa/vocabularies and there's an issues list at http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ivoa/vocabularies/issues

Vocabularies in the document

One of the open issues (vocabset-5) is to decide which vocabularies to include in the standard document. There are six vocabularies which have been associated with the draft standardisation process, namely the A&A journal keyword list, the IVOA AOIM list, the 1993 IAU thesaurus, an IVOA Thesaurus based on that, a UCD1+ vocabulary (though there are some questions about whether that's a vocabulary of concepts, or a set of types), and a SKOS version of the list of constellations. There are multiple informal keyword lists associated with the VOEvent arena (see Roy's message and Rob's). The way to make progress here is possibly to have various people adopt a vocabulary, for the period leading up to the standardisation.

The vocabularies I'm aware of are:

vocab in repository? patron
A&A yes AlasdairGray
IVOAT yes Rick
IAU93 yes AlasdairGray
UCD yes ?
AOIM yes ?
Constellations yes Rick
AT no Roy?
ATEL, GCN, CBAT, ... no ?

Is this a good list? Ought there to be more, or fewer? Volunteers? The VOEvent lists should be pretty trivial to set up, but would need someone to push them along.

-- NormanGray - 05 Feb 2008


<--  
-->
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback