UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Reference Interoperable Implementations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page.
Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconi , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Document Tree | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Document Tree clarified in the version PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20191007.pdf see above | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UCDList1.3 -REC document at ivoa/Documents
|------------- request For Modification page on the wiki is UCDList_1-3_RFM
|------------- UCDList_1-4_EndorsedNote.pdf is in progress
Grid & Web Services Working Group
The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks MLouys 20190520 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<--
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations Validators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Illustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Illustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconi , S. Erard | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
|
Group | Yes | No | Abstain | Comments |
TCG | * | -- PatrickDowler - 2019-09-06 | ||
Apps | * | |||
DAL | * | the mailing list should be updated, enforced and reflected in the RFM pages | ||
DM | * | would like to see the implementations cleaned up to make following the procedure easier in the future | ||
GWS | * | Minor formatting changes requested. | ||
Registry | * | |||
Semantics | * | |||
DataCP | * | |||
KDD | ||||
SSIG | * | |||
Theory | ||||
TD | ||||
Ops | ||||
StdProc |
<--
META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" attr="" comment="PR_UCDlistMaintenenance 2.0 updates from TCG remarks" date="1563205788" name="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" path="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" size="264437" user="MireilleLouys" version="2" |
---|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
|
Group | Yes | No | Abstain | Comments |
TCG | * | -- PatrickDowler - 2019-09-06 | ||
Apps | * | |||
DAL | * | the mailing list should be updated, enforced and reflected in the RFM pages | ||
DM | * | would like to see the implementations cleaned up to make following the procedure easier in the future | ||
GWS | * | Minor formatting changes requested. | ||
Registry | * | |||
Semantics | * |
DataCP |
DataCP | * |
KDD | ||||
SSIG | * | |||
Theory | ||||
TD | ||||
Ops | ||||
StdProc |
<--
META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" attr="" comment="PR_UCDlistMaintenenance 2.0 updates from TCG remarks" date="1563205788" name="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" path="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" size="264437" user="MireilleLouys" version="2" |
---|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | UCDList1.3 -REC document at ivoa/Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | UCDList1.3 -REC document at ivoa/Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|------------- request For Modification page on the wiki is UCDList_1-3_RFM
|------------- UCDList_1-4_EndorsedNote.pdf is in progress
Grid & Web Services Working Group
The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks MLouys 20190520 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
|
Group | Yes | No | Abstain | Comments |
TCG |
TCG | * | -- PatrickDowler - 2019-09-06 |
Apps | * | |||
DAL | * | the mailing list should be updated, enforced and reflected in the RFM pages | ||
DM | * | would like to see the implementations cleaned up to make following the procedure easier in the future | ||
GWS | * | Minor formatting changes requested. | ||
Registry | * | |||
Semantics | * | |||
DataCP | ||||
KDD |
SSIG | * |
SSIG | * |
Theory | ||||
TD | ||||
Ops | ||||
StdProc |
<--
META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" attr="" comment="PR_UCDlistMaintenenance 2.0 updates from TCG remarks" date="1563205788" name="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" path="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" size="264437" user="MireilleLouys" version="2" |
---|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
|
Group | Yes | No | Abstain | Comments |
TCG | ||||
Apps | * | |||
DAL | * | the mailing list should be updated, enforced and reflected in the RFM pages | ||
DM | * | would like to see the implementations cleaned up to make following the procedure easier in the future | ||
GWS | * | Minor formatting changes requested. | ||
Registry | * | |||
Semantics | * | |||
DataCP | ||||
KDD |
SSIG |
SSIG | * |
Theory | ||||
TD | ||||
Ops | ||||
StdProc |
<--
META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" attr="" comment="PR_UCDlistMaintenenance 2.0 updates from TCG remarks" date="1563205788" name="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" path="PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20190715.pdf" size="264437" user="MireilleLouys" version="2" |
---|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | No further comments from GWS. -- GiulianoTaffoni - 2019-08-12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks MLouys 20190520 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Grid & Web Services Working Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Grid & Web Services Working Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks MLouys 20190520 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | |------------- UCDList_1-4_EndorsedNote.pdf is in progress | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | |------------- UCDList_1-4_EndorsedNote.pdf is in progress | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grid & Web Services Working Group
The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks MLouys 20190520 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | The Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | The Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Reference Interoperable Implementations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee . | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implementations Validators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Illustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Illustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconni , S. Erard | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-4_RFM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: 2018/10/26 - 2018/11/16WG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment. IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory.TCG Chair & Vice ChairApplications Working GroupI approve the document. While reading, I did have the same questions and concerns raised by DM and GWS, so I endorse their suggested changes and clarifications. -- TomDonaldson - 2019-03-22Data Access Layer Working GroupDAL chair/vice approve the document. However there are a couple of points we'd like to see clarified or acted upon. One (major) is about the ucd-sci@ivoa.net mailing list. The list seems to be outdated and, while it is asked the submitters to send notification of requests there, this is not reflected in the RFM page. A second (medium) is about the "user" role, described as "any member of the astronomical community" on page 3, but later the doc states any "IVOA member". Given IVOA membership is not so well defined...maybe saying "anyone who has successfully obtained an IVOA TWiki account" would do and would solve also the contact information needed. Other minor/typographical things are: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Model Working GroupThe document is clear and straight forward.. no problem there. My only comment is that the implementations (last 2 cycles of RFM) do not follow this procedure, at least with respect to the naming convention for the twiki pages. The spec says "UCDlist-<version_number>-<date>-RFM" while the 2 most recent are "UCDList1dot42017June2018FebRFM" and the current is "RFMforUCD". Also, can you clarify for me, the <version_number> is the version of the released UCD list. For example, the current REC is 1.3, so the list being built up as RFM to that list should be in a file named "UCDlist-1_3-<date>-RFM", and the 1.4 list (above) would be updates to a V1.4 Endorsed Note, which does not seem to exist. Do I have this right? I will approve the document, but would like to see these cleaned up to make it clearer for following the procedure in the future. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Grid & Web Services Working Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Document Tree | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | UCDList1.3 -REC document at ivoa/Documents |------------- request For Modification page on the wiki is UCDList_1-3_RFM |------------- UCDList_1-4_EndorsedNote.pdf is in progress Grid & Web Services Working Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | -- BrianMajor - 2019-03-12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Registry Working Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | I approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process. One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 _adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks _ MLouys 20190520 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | I approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process. One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks MLouys 20190520 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<--
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-4_RFM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | changed MLouys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | added MLouys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | changed MLouys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | changed MLouys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | We support also the DM request for cleaning the TWiki topic naming syntax. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | changed MLouys 20190520 We support also the DM request for cleaning the TWiki topic naming syntax. Naming of RFM pages :Fixed during Interop May 2019 thanks to Marco Molinaro MLouys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-- MarcoMolinaro - 2019-04-15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Data Model Working Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Data Model Working Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The document is clear and straight forward.. no problem there.
My only comment is that the implementations (last 2 cycles of RFM) do not follow this procedure, at least with respect to the naming convention for the twiki pages. The spec says "UCDlist-<version_number>-<date>-RFM" while the 2 most recent are "UCDList1dot42017June2018FebRFM" and the current is "RFMforUCD".
Also, can you clarify for me, the <version_number> is the version of the released UCD list. For example, the current REC is 1.3, so the list being built up as RFM to that list should be in a file named "UCDlist-1_3-<date>-RFM", and the 1.4 list (above) would be updates to a V1.4 Endorsed Note, which does not seem to exist. Do I have this right?
I will approve the document, but would like to see these cleaned up to make it clearer for following the procedure in the future.
Grid & Web Services Working GroupThe process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | changed MLouys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | -- BrianMajor - 2019-03-12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | -- BrianMajor - 2019-03-12 _Changed as Links _ M.Louys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Registry Working Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | I approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process. One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | I approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process. One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 _adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks _ MLouys 20190520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grid & Web Services Working GroupThe process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
|
Group | Yes | No | Abstain | Comments |
TCG | ||||
Apps | ||||
DAL | * | the mailing list should be updated, enforced and reflected in the RFM pages | ||
DM | * | would like to see the implementations cleaned up to make following the procedure easier in the future | ||
GWS | * | Minor formatting changes requested. | ||
<nop>RoR | ||||
Semantics | ||||
<nop>DataCP | ||||
KDD | ||||
SSIG | ||||
Theory | ||||
TD | ||||
Ops | ||||
<nop>StdProc |
<--
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | One (major) is about the ucd-sci@ivoa.net mailing list. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | One (major) is about the ucd-sci@ivoa.net mailing list. The list seems to be outdated and, while it is asked the submitters to send notification of requests there, this is not reflected in the RFM page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | The list seems to be outdated and, while it is asked the submitters to send notification of requests there, this is not reflected in the RFM page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | A second (medium) is about the "user" role, described as "any member of the astronomical community" on page 3, but later the doc states any "IVOA member". | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | A second (medium) is about the "user" role, described as "any member of the astronomical community" on page 3, but later the doc states any "IVOA member". Given IVOA membership is not so well defined...maybe saying "anyone who has successfully obtained an IVOA TWiki account" would do and would solve also the contact information needed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Given IVOA membership is not so well defined...maybe saying "anyone who has successfully obtained an IVOA TWiki account" would do and would solve also the contact information needed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other minor/typographical things are:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | We support also the DM request for cleaning the TWiki topic naming syntax. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | We support also the DM request for cleaning the TWiki topic naming syntax. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-- MarcoMolinaro - 2019-04-15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Data Model Working Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Data Model Working Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The document is clear and straight forward.. no problem there.
My only comment is that the implementations (last 2 cycles of RFM) do not follow this procedure, at least with respect to the naming convention for the twiki pages. The spec says "UCDlist-<version_number>-<date>-RFM" while the 2 most recent are "UCDList1dot42017June2018FebRFM" and the current is "RFMforUCD".
Also, can you clarify for me, the <version_number> is the version of the released UCD list. For example, the current REC is 1.3, so the list being built up as RFM to that list should be in a file named "UCDlist-1_3-<date>-RFM", and the 1.4 list (above) would be updates to a V1.4 Endorsed Note, which does not seem to exist. Do I have this right?
I will approve the document, but would like to see these cleaned up to make it clearer for following the procedure in the future.
Grid & Web Services Working GroupThe process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Access Layer Working Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | DAL chair/vice approve the document.
However there are a couple of points we'd like to see clarified or acted upon.
One (major) is about the ucd-sci@ivoa.net mailing list.
The list seems to be outdated and, while it is asked the submitters to send notification of requests there, this is not reflected in the RFM page.
A second (medium) is about the "user" role, described as "any member of the astronomical community" on page 3, but later the doc states any "IVOA member".
Given IVOA membership is not so well defined...maybe saying "anyone who has successfully obtained an IVOA TWiki account" would do and would solve also the contact information needed.
Other minor/typographical things are:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Model Working GroupThe document is clear and straight forward.. no problem there. My only comment is that the implementations (last 2 cycles of RFM) do not follow this procedure, at least with respect to the naming convention for the twiki pages. The spec says "UCDlist-<version_number>-<date>-RFM" while the 2 most recent are "UCDList1dot42017June2018FebRFM" and the current is "RFMforUCD". Also, can you clarify for me, the <version_number> is the version of the released UCD list. For example, the current REC is 1.3, so the list being built up as RFM to that list should be in a file named "UCDlist-1_3-<date>-RFM", and the 1.4 list (above) would be updates to a V1.4 Endorsed Note, which does not seem to exist. Do I have this right? I will approve the document, but would like to see these cleaned up to make it clearer for following the procedure in the future.Grid & Web Services Working GroupThe process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | I approve the document. While reading, I did have the same questions and concerns raised by DM and GWS, so I endorse their suggested changes and clarifications. -- TomDonaldson - 2019-03-22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Access Layer Working GroupData Model Working GroupThe document is clear and straight forward.. no problem there. My only comment is that the implementations (last 2 cycles of RFM) do not follow this procedure, at least with respect to the naming convention for the twiki pages. The spec says "UCDlist-<version_number>-<date>-RFM" while the 2 most recent are "UCDList1dot42017June2018FebRFM" and the current is "RFMforUCD". Also, can you clarify for me, the <version_number> is the version of the released UCD list. For example, the current REC is 1.3, so the list being built up as RFM to that list should be in a file named "UCDlist-1_3-<date>-RFM", and the 1.4 list (above) would be updates to a V1.4 Endorsed Note, which does not seem to exist. Do I have this right? I will approve the document, but would like to see these cleaned up to make it clearer for following the procedure in the future.Grid & Web Services Working Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-- BrianMajor - 2019-03-12
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | The document is clear and straight forward.. no problem there. My only comment is that the implementations (last 2 cycles of RFM) do not follow this procedure, at least with respect to the naming convention for the twiki pages. The spec says "UCDlist-<version_number>-<date>-RFM" while the 2 most recent are "UCDList1dot42017June2018FebRFM" and the current is "RFMforUCD". Also, can you clarify for me, the <version_number> is the version of the released UCD list. For example, the current REC is 1.3, so the list being built up as RFM to that list should be in a file named "UCDlist-1_3-<date>-RFM", and the 1.4 list (above) would be updates to a V1.4 Endorsed Note, which does not seem to exist. Do I have this right? I will approve the document, but would like to see these cleaned up to make it clearer for following the procedure in the future. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grid & Web Services Working GroupRegistry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | I approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process. One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Comments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: TCG_start_date - TCG_end_date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Comments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: 2018/10/26 - 2018/11/16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment.
IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory.
TCG Chair & Vice ChairApplications Working GroupData Access Layer Working GroupData Model Working GroupGrid & Web Services Working GroupRegistry Working GroupSemantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | UCD Maintenance Standard :: Proposed Recommendation: Request for Comments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for Comments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Feel free to include here an introductory paragraph describing the IVOASTANDARD being addressed here | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | The Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latest version of Maintenance For UCDList can be found at: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference Interoperable Implementations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | The process is illustrated by the modeification request page and the various update , comments, and validation steps regisytred directly on the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | The process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. Erard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | see for instance the RFM Page : http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/RFMforUCD | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Comments from the IVOA Community during RFC/TCG review period: 2018/09/12 - 2018/10/12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
Comments from the IVOA Community during RFC/TCG review period: RFC_start_date - RFC_end_date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
Comments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: TCG_start_date - TCG_end_dateWG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment. IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory.TCG Chair & Vice ChairApplications Working GroupData Access Layer Working GroupData Model Working GroupGrid & Web Services Working GroupRegistry Working GroupSemantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|
UCD Maintenance Standard :: Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsFeel free to include here an introductory paragraph describing the IVOASTANDARD being addressed here Latest version of Maintenance For UCDList can be found at:
Reference Interoperable ImplementationsThe process is illustrated by the modeification request page and the various update , comments, and validation steps regisytred directly on the page. Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science . / B. Cecconni , S. ErardComments from the IVOA Community during RFC/TCG review period: RFC_start_date - RFC_end_dateThe comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section. In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment. Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this documentComments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: TCG_start_date - TCG_end_dateWG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment. IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory.TCG Chair & Vice ChairApplications Working GroupData Access Layer Working GroupData Model Working GroupGrid & Web Services Working GroupRegistry Working GroupSemantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<!--</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"> TWikiAdminGroup</span> </li> </ul></li> </ul>--> <--
|