UCD Maintenance Standard/ Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThe Maintenance Process for the set of terms defined as IVOA Unified Content Descriptors is defined in this specification in order to allow the UCD list to evolve following the needs of the astronomical community. It relies on:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Reference Interoperable Implementations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The process is illustrated by the modification request page and the various update, comment, and validation steps registred directly on the page.
Actors in the process are : IVOA participants , Semantics Working group chair and vice-chair, UCD maintenance board committee .
Implementations ValidatorsIllustration for the add-ons of new terms related to Planetary science / B. Cecconi , S. Erard see for instance the RFM Page : UCDList_1-3_RFM
The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | Document Tree | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | Document Tree clarified in the version PR-UCDlistMaintenance-2.0-20191007.pdf see above | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UCDList1.3 -REC document at ivoa/Documents
|------------- request For Modification page on the wiki is UCDList_1-3_RFM
|------------- UCDList_1-4_EndorsedNote.pdf is in progress
Grid & Web Services Working Group
The process seems reasonable and straightforward. I only have a couple of document formatting requests:
Registry Working GroupI approve of this document. I see the scientific advisory board to Semantics functioning as a less meeting-involved arm of the working group, much as registry maintainers in the RofR ecosystem are often indirectly involved in meetings but necessary for our WG's reference implementations and feedback. Hopefully the change to Endorsed Notes also helps speed up process.One grammar comment for the introduction: Singular "they" would be more natural in English here and more inclusive, over "he/she". -- TheresaDower - 2018-10-29 Adopted the singular "They" for inclusive notation, thanks MLouys 20190520 Semantics Working GroupData Curation & Preservation Interest GroupEducation Interest GroupKnowledge Discovery in Databases Interest GroupSolar System Interest GroupTheory Interest GroupTime Domain Interest GroupOperationsStandards and Processes CommitteeTCG Vote : Vote_start_date - Vote_end_dateIf you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
<--
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Added: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||