Difference: VocabulariesV20RFC (3 vs. 4)

Revision 42021-04-22 - LaurentMichel

 
META TOPICPARENT name="IvoaTCG"

Vocabularies in the VO 2 Proposed Recommendation: Request for Comments

Changed:
<
<
Vocabularies in the VO, version 2, proposes formats and practices to manage
>
>
Vocabularies in the VO, version 2, proposes formats and practices to manage hierarchical word lists that need consensus within the VO. See http://ivoa.net/rdf the vocabularies currently in use or under consideration.
Deleted:
<
<
hierarchical word lists that need consensus within the VO. See http://ivoa.net/rdf the vocabularies currently in use or under consideration.
 
Changed:
<
<
Note that this is not “Semantics in the VO”, i.e., further applications of RDF (e.g., full ontologies) are by no means excluded by this specification.
>
>
Note that this is not “Semantics in the VO”, i.e., further applications of RDF (e.g., full ontologies) are by no means excluded by this specification.
  Latest version of Vocabularies in the VO 2 can be found at:
Deleted:
<
<
 A build of svn trunk with some typos removed is available at https://docs.g-vo.org/Vocabularies.pdf

Reference Interoperable Implementations

Changed:
<
<
Vocabularies of the type described here are in use by several existing
>
>
Vocabularies of the type described here are in use by several existing standards:
Deleted:
<
<
standards:
 
  • Datalink (the semantics column)
  • VOTable (TIMESYS time scales and reference positions)
  • VOResource (relationship types, content levels, content types, date roles, prospectively the subject keywords)
  • SimpleDALRegExt (under review: product types)
  • VODataService (under review: messengers)
Added:
>
>
The code managing the RDF repository is available at https://volute.g-vo.org/svn/trunk/projects/semantics/voc-source
 
Deleted:
<
<
The code managing the RDF repository is available at https://volute.g-vo.org/svn/trunk/projects/semantics/voc-source
 Implementations on the consumer side:

  • stilts' VOTable validator uses vocabularies to check the TIMESYS attributes (this gives a simple example for how to deal with IVOA vocabularies in Java)
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
  • Sembarebro is an example for how to use vocabularies from Javascript (code)
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
 On processes defined:

  • several VEPs have been run
Changed:
<
<
  • a PEN has been produced for vocabulary adoption: https://ivoa.net/documents/uat-as-upstream/20201117/ – it is probably a good idea to give this a brief look, too, when reviewing Vocabularies 2. Perhaps these Vocabularies 2 should give some constraints what must minimally be addressed in this kind of document
>
>
  • a PEN has been produced for vocabulary adoption: https://ivoa.net/documents/uat-as-upstream/20201117/ – it is probably a good idea to give this a brief look, too, when reviewing Vocabularies 2. Perhaps these Vocabularies 2 should give some constraints what must minimally be addressed in this kind of document
 
Deleted:
<
<
 Plans for the consumer side:

  • The RofR publishing registry validator should use the VOResource vocabularies; we expect this to happen during RFC.

Implementations Validators

Changed:
<
<
The vocabulary process itself is in some sense self-validating because the input files are parsed and mangled. A “deeper” validation (“are these concepts any good?”; “can people work out from a description what is and what is not within the concept?”) is probably beyond what automated validators can do.
>
>
The vocabulary process itself is in some sense self-validating because the input files are parsed and mangled. A “deeper” validation (“are these concepts any good?”; “can people work out from a description what is and what is not within the concept?”) is probably beyond what automated validators can do.
  As to the external interface, common RDF validators can be used to check the syntactic correctness of our artefacts, for instance the W3C RDF validator.
Deleted:
<
<
 

Comments from the IVOA Community during RFC/TCG review period: 2021-03-22 through 2021-05-03

The comments from the TCG members during the RFC/TCG review should be included in the next section.

In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.

Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document



Comments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: 2021-03-22 through 2021-05-03

Deleted:
<
<
 WG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment.

IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory.

TCG Chair & Vice Chair

Applications Working Group

Data Access Layer Working Group

Data Model Working Group

Added:
>
>
I've a few comments that do not requires document changes:
  • P6 The UCD-Vocab binding could be more detailed
  • P7 I really appreciate the reading guide
  • P10 Links between DM and vocab need further reflexions
  • General: How a client can retrieve the vocabulary a word refers to?
    A client getting BARYCENTER as TIMESYS@reflocation has no way to know that the word BARYCENTER is part of http://ivoa.net/rdf/refposition
  • P34 A3: is the volute URL supposed to survive Vocabukary 2.0
and a few non blocking suggestions from a novice reader Approved
-- LaurentMichel - 2021-04-22
 

Grid & Web Services Working Group

Registry Working Group

Semantics Working Group

Data Curation & Preservation Interest Group

Education Interest Group

Knowledge Discovery Interest Group

Solar System Interest Group

Theory Interest Group

Time Domain Interest Group

Operations

Accept. -- MarkTaylor - 2021-03-20

Standards and Processes Committee


TCG Vote: TBD

If you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.

Group Yes No Abstain Comments
TCG        
Apps        
DAL        
Changed:
<
<
DM        
>
>
DM *      
 
GWS        
Registry        
Semantics        
DCP        
KDIG        
SSIG        
Theory        
TD        
Ops *      
StdProc        
Changed:
<
<
>
>

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback