TWiki
>
IVOA Web
>
WebPreferences
>
InterOpMay2016
>
InterOpMay2016TCG
>
InterOpTCG-2016-05-08
(2016-05-13,
PatrickDowler
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
---+ TCG F2F Meeting - 2016-05-08 in Stellenbosch, SA ---++ present: Tom McGlynn (TMcG), Markus Demleitner (MD), Christophe Arviset (CA), John Swinbank (JS), Francoise Genova (FG), Kai Polsterer (KP), Mark Taylor (MT), Theresa Dower (TD), Tom Donaldson (TD2), Mark Allen (MA), Alberto Accomazzi (AA), Carlos Rodrigo (CR), Mark Cresitello-Ditmar (MCD), Brian Major (BM), Francois Bonnarel (FB), Massimo Ramella (MR), Marco Molinaro (MM), Franck LePetit (FL), Pat Dowler (PD), Matthew Graham (MG), Mireille Louys (ML), Laurent Michel (LM), Giuliano Taffoni (GT) ---++ 1. action items from last telecon Note: +ACTION means a new action item <br />ACTION: TMcG make validators easy to find by external users [closed] <br />ACTION: MM to do something with registration/profile page [ip]<br />+ACTION: MM to email TCG about options<br />ACTION: MM to automate doc page on submission [ip]<br />ACTION: MM to document the mailing list management features [done]<br />ACTION: ALL to update 2015B Roadmap (Sydney->Capetown) [[ip]<br />ACTION: MG/PD to hassle chairs about Roadmap [done]<br />ACTION: ALL to review "how to publish" page [onging]<br />ACTION: FG to update for new S&P [done]<br />ACTION: MCD to update spectral-2.0 doc to reflect current state [of disinterest] [ip]<br />WG chairs - recommend move old/dormant specs out of main repo listing, also xsd files?<br />ACTION: MG, PD, and MCD to discuss STC2 review [ip]<br />- MD: split STC uo into core and other stuff like transforms, whole model fail<br />- FG: several people at least need to assess what is core and how to proceed<br />- MCD: dataset model includes stc2 but could be the core set needed for cubes<br />- TD2: agree with decoupling<br />+ACTION: MG to ask exec to create a team to assess STC2 and create a plan to move forward<br />ACTION: MG and PD to check status of PR-Identifiers-2.0 [done]<br />ACTION: PD will request WG input for sessions in late Feb [done]<br /><br />+ACTION: WG chairs to update TCG page with status of standards ---++ 2. status of standards in process <br />+ACTION: MM (Giulia) "in progress" column must contain RFC link to the RFC Page<br />+ACTION: MG/PD/MM to get doc page updated asap (before exec)<br /><br />PR in RFC phase: ObsCore-1.1, SSO-2.0, VOSI-1.1<br />PR ready to go: VTP-2.0, SODA-1.0<br /><br />UWS-1.1 ready (one TCG approval remaining) ---++ 3. status of standards impacting WG/IG <br />utypes?<br />MCD: low level effort available from Gerard and Tom on VO-DML and mapping document<br />MG: what is being held up waiting for VO-DML and.or mapping?<br />MD: no classic way to do this, but we need to do it<br />MCD: progress is happening but it is slow<br />TD2: insufficient effort available, required effort not too large<br />MA: does this match the needs of people who will implement/use this?<br />FG: we need to show that this is viable as a standards<br />MG: not much to show for > 18 months<br />+ACTION: TD2 to spend a month implementing utype mapping<br />MCD: Gerard and Omar have to be the ones to update mapping document<br />FB: VO-DML could go forward first, then mapping document<br />.... highly technical discussion ...<br />FG: make sure that what the IVOA recommends is implementable and useful ---++ 4. InterOp Programme <br />Focus Sessions<br /><br />MA: wednesday discussion with projects, breakout and talk requirements<br />MA: will be homework for projects<br />MG: and homework for the WG/IGs<br />TD2: can we help map vo terminology to normal project language?<br />FG: big projects in Europe are well aware of and use VO already<br />MG: any questions from WGs about how Wednesday will work?<br />+ACTION: MA to explain how the splinter will work at the start of the spinter session<br />MG: 20 minutes of general discussion then break out into a few groups, parallel or series?<br /><br />+ACTION: PD to ask Patricia if people can hang around after 1730 [done] ---++ 5. Endorsing Note on XML Schema policy <br />TODO: lightweight endorse process: TCG endorse or RFC period?<br /><br />+ACTION MG/PD to proceed with an RFC for XML Schema note<br /><br />MG: TCG chair and vice chair have to supervise the RFC for endorsed notes ---++ 6. S&P Document <br />FG: endorsed by the TCG, optional RFC period<br />FG: process for errata<br />MM: landing page for errata, errata to be approved by the TCG<br />... discussion about template for spec-proposed-features wiki page...<br />FG: propose that the landing page has links: current spec + errata; agreed by TCG<br />FG: also proposed link to next (feature list)<br />MD/TMcG: propose link to RFC page as well, PD kind of agrees<br /><br />+ACTION: S&P committee to figure out what goes on the spec landing page<br /><br />... status of a note between "note" and "endorsed note"? proposed endorsed note?<br /><br />MD: ok, let's implement it and see how it works<br />+ACTION: FG to write the status paragraph for proposed-endorsed-note and endorsed-note<br />+ACTION: MD to tweak ivoatex<br />+ACTION: MM to figure out how doc repo can accept/handle proposed-endorsed-note and endorsed-note<br />MM: p-e-n status for RFC only, otherwise skip<br /><br />MG: what about IAU endorsement of standards?<br />FG: a risk mitigation to include this possibility in S&P document<br /><br />MG: does S&P need a status paragraph for dead standards?<br />MT: not needed, already covered in secton 2 and details should be left to authors<br /><br />+ACTION: FG to proceed with WD-DocumentStandards-2.0 ---++ 7. reference implementations <br />+ACTION: MG to review the language about implementation requirements<br /><br />GT: opensource source reference implementations encouraged<br /><br />FG: can be documented in the "publishing in the VO" page now ---++ 8. validation <br />LM: hard to figure out what to fix from validation error messages<br />TMcG: try to exlain but it is a lot of work, cadence slow<br />MD: also an issue in registry<br />ML: lack of documentation for VO newcomers and developers<br />FG: not sure we should explain technical details of the VO to users; apps should hide the VO<br /><br />TMcG: showed wiki page with table listing validators for various IVOA standards<br /><br />+ACTION: TCG to update PublishingInTheVO page when standards pages are updated/created<br /><br />+ACTION: MG/PD to create 2016A Roadmap page<br />+ACTION: WG chairs to fill in 2016A Roadmap by June 30, 2016 <br /> <!-- * Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME = IVOA.TWikiAdminGroup -->
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
Watch
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 2016-05-13
-
PatrickDowler
IVOA
Log in
or
Register
IVOA.net
Wiki Home
WebChanges
WebTopicList
WebStatistics
Twiki Meta & Help
IVOA
Know
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
TWiki intro
TWiki tutorial
User registration
Notify me
Working Groups
Applications
Data Access Layer
Data Model
Grid & Web Services
Registry
Semantics
Interest Groups
Data Curation
Education
Knowledge Discovery
Operations
Radio Astronomy
Solar System
Theory
Time Domain
Committees
Stds&Procs
www.ivoa.net
Documents
Events
Members
XML Schema
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback