(r5) ObsCore-1_1-Erratum-2 < IVOA

IVOA Web>IvoaDataModel>ObsDMCoreComponents>ObsCoreDMvOnedotOne>ObsCore-1_1-Errata>ObsCore-1_1-Erratum-2 (revision 5) (raw view)~~EditAttach~~

---+ ObsCore 1.1: Erratum 2

Author: DM WG

Date last changed: 2018-11-18

Date accepted:
---++ Rationale

This erratum corrects a few issues noted in the [[http://www.ivoa.net/documents/ObsCore/20170509/REC-ObsCore-v1.1-20170509.pdf][ObsCore-1.1 document ]]. Since most are small typo level items, it we include multiple items in one erratum.

   1 Implementation feedback from Marco Molinaro, see http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/2017-August/005604.html:
<em>cite:<br />&gt;&gt; 1 - pol_states This field is listed as mandatory in §3.2 (Table 1, page 21) but then, Appendix B page 42, in Table 5 the MANdatory column says NO. After that, Table 6 on page 57 lists pol_states again among the mandatory fields. This looks like simply a typo.</em><em><br />&gt;&gt; 2 - t_refpos This field is listed in Table 5 (Appendix B) page 41 as an optional one, but has no other entry in the specification, e.g. it has no entry in Table 7 (Appendix C.2) so that no Utype or UCD is defined for it. This one looks like a simple forgetfulness.<br />&gt;&gt; 3 - units for strings Table 5 (pagg. 40-43) reports units for the various fields. However it defines string-type fields to be unitless except for s_region (no value is reported) and proposal_id (which is set as unit=string).</em>

Author answers about<strong> t_refpos</strong> :
   * as we are considering Time series to be handled by ObsCore for discovery, this reference for the time system has to be re worked. Feedback from the dm list is welcome for this.
   * It seems this is a placeholder for future expansion of ObsCore, it seems appropriate to remove this item from the Table 5, and restore it when the full specification can be provided in an update to the REC.
   * Meanwhile,<strong> t_refpos</strong> will be removed from the optional parameter<em><br /></em>
---++ Erratum Content
---++++ pol_states
---+++++ Original Wording
   * Table 1, page 21: *pol_states* is mandatory
   * Appendix B page 42, in Table 5: MANdatory=no for *pol_states*
   * Table 6 on page 57: *pol_states* is mandatory
   * This field is listed as mandatory in §3.2 (Table 1, page 21) but then, Appendix B page 42, in Table 5 the MANdatory column says NO. After that, Table 6 on page 57 lists pol_states again among the mandatory fields. This looks like simply a typo.
---+++++ New Wording
   * Appendix B: Table 5 on page 42: *pol_states* is MAN=YES
---++++ t_refpos
---+++++ Original Wording
   * *t_refpos* mentionned in Table 5 (Appendix B) page 41 as an optional.
---+++++ New Wording
   * *t_refpos* removed from Table 5 (Appendix B)
---++++ units for strings
---+++++ Original Wording
   * Table 5 page 40: *s_region*: unit = "" .
   * Table 5 page 43: *proposal_id* : unit = "string".
---+++++ New Wording
   * Table 5 page 40: *s_region*: unit = "unitless" .
   * Table 5 page 43: *proposal_id* : unit = "unitless".

---++++ missing _facility_name_
---+++++ Original Wording
   * *facility_name* missing in table 5
---+++++ New Wording
   * *facility_name* added to table 5 added as mandatory field
---++++ Inconsistency in 'principal' settings
---+++++ Original Wording
   * The following fields, all declared as optional (MAN = NO) in table 5 page 40 and &lsquo;principal&rsquo; is set to 1 in TABLE 6. 
      * dataproduct_subtype
      * target_class
      * obs_creation_date
      * obs_creation_name
      * obs_title
      * publisher_id
      * obs_release_date
      * s_ucd
      * s_unit
      * s_resolution_min
      * s_resolution_max
      * s_pixel_scale
      * s_calib_status
      * em_ucd
      * em_unit
      * em_res_power_min

---+++++ New Wording
   * No change in tables 5 and 6
   * Page 55: The definition of the *principal* column has been updated. Its is not equivalent to mandatory status of the field. All mandatory fields are principal and some optional fields can be principal either
---++ Impact Assessment
   * Implementations which follow the ObsCore specification for these UDS are compliant with the model spec, but produce a validation error by taplint which validates the UCD value against the UCD specification.
   * Clients using *t_refpos* are non longer compliant with the spec. This column must be now considered as an Obscore extension.
   * Implementation not using<strong> pol_states</strong> must add this column to be compliant
---++ Notes

   1 The proposed changes are in the errata proposed document attached here [[%ATTACHURL%/REC-ObsCore-v1.1-20181130_errata.pdf][REC-ObsCore-v1.1-20181130_errata.pdf]]
&lt;!--<br /> * Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME =&lt;span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"&gt; IVOA.TWikiAdminGroup&lt;/span&gt;<br />--&gt;

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
pdf	REC-ObsCore-v1.1-20181130_errata.pdf	r1	manage	1155.6 K	2019-01-07 - 12:08	MireilleLouys	Correction included in this new version of the ObsCore-v1.1 specification

Topic revision: r5 - 2019-05-10 - MireilleLouys

IVOA

Log in or Register

IVOA.net
Wiki Home
WebChanges
WebTopicList
WebStatistics

Twiki Meta & Help
IVOA
Know
Main
Sandbox
TWiki

TWiki intro
TWiki tutorial
User registration
Notify me

Working Groups

Interest Groups

Committees

Stds&Procs

www.ivoa.net
Documents
Events
Members
XML Schema