Provenance day in Heidelberg, Germany, 2016 June 14th

hosted at ARI, prior to the data forum http://www.g-vo.org/edp-forum-2016

Follow-up meeting

Participants

insert your name here...

Venue

A room is reserved for us at Astronomisches Rechen-Institut (ARI), see http://www.g-vo.org/edp-forum-2016/venue.html for how to get there.

Topics to dicuss

* Data Model updates

* Structuring a database from the data model

* Storing/serializing the Activity/Entity Descriptions

- AI Mathieu: make a proposition for next meeting (vo-table params? or json? xml?)

* Access to the Provenance database

- first version without "parameter"-class, ObsCore like => ProvTAP

* Structure and content of the IVOA working draft

* Roadmap for Trieste (Interop in October) and beyond

* Contributions to ADASS Oct. 2016?

- AI: Kristin: Provenance Overview/Review

- AI: Mathieu: CTA + Provenance

* Next Provenance day meeting

- 18.-20. July or week of 22nd August in Paris, Mathieu will check room availability

* news : the provenance Week / RDA interest group (little activity) /

Goals as proposed for roadmap (Kristin)

• define minimum requirements for the data model
• - finalize the data model (diagram)
• –so that it works with only minor modifications for all our use cases
• –including VODML-compliant representation (e.g. using Modelio, Magic Draw)
• have the draft out as official working draft
  • –structure of the draft
  • rewrite a concise introduction : AI: Mathieu: goals , provenance definition of term in our context, how it is inserted in context ( what it is not ( Wflow), previous efforts, insert architecture section
  • –including minimum requirements
    • what is needed and reused from W3C : W3C Core
  • –including a section on serialising the data model
  • –including a section on accessing provenance data

• • get the progenitors for a specified dataset (entity)
  • give me the history , activities and progenitors for a particular entity
  • responsibility view for the agent : who was involved for this activity / for this entity
  • get me the activities execution and activity description
  • AI all: question to answer: is Activity description part of the model or part of the implementation
  • should we plan diff levels of detail?
  • details levels : basic , detailed, full it is up to the applications and access services --> reformulate more simply Mireille? all ?
  • 1.2.4 Kristin --> rewrite
  • AI François add in Previous efforts / PAW community
• Assign sections to various writers and decide a deadline
• - July
• work out relations between SimDM and ProvDM
  • – (have at least one use case worked out with both models)

Agenda

10:00

11:00

14:00

15:00

16:00

17:00