Resource Metadata RFC
This document will act as
RFC centre for the
Resource Metadata v1.1 Proposed Recommendation.
In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your
WikiName so authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment.
Discussion about any of the comments or responses should be conducted on the virtual observatory query language mailing list,
registry@ivoa.net.
Community Comments
- First sample comment (by MarcoLeoni): ...
- Response (by authorname): ...
- Second sample comment (): ...
Comments from the Technical Coordination Group
TWG members should add their comments under their name. The deadline for comments is 27 Oct 2006.
Note: RM v1.01 is a REC already; see sect. 7 for summary of changes since then.
Marc Allen (Applications IG)
please edit
Francoise Genova (Data Curation & Preservation IG)
please edit
Bob Hanisch (Standards & Documentation WG)
please edit
Gerard Lemson (Theory IG)
please edit
Jonathan McDowell (Data Models WG)
In section 3.2, I don't like the idea that there is
Creator and Creator.Logo. I'd like these fields to be the
utypes of the data model for RM, and that would be cleaner
if you either change Creator to Creator.Name or change
Creator.Logo to
CreatorLogo (no dot).
You have
ReferenceURL which must be a URL, but I think there
also ought to be a
ReferenceBibcode and I don't see one.
I realize these technical comments are late, and I will
approve the rec even if you choose not to adopt them.
Reagan Moore (Data Curation & Preservation IG)
please edit
Francois Ochsenbein (VOTable WG)
please edit
Pedro Osuna (VOQL WG)
please edit
Ray Plante (Resource Registry WG)
Submitting Chair: no comments.
Andrea Priete-Martinez (Semantics WG)
I approve.
Guy Rixon (Grid & Web Services WG)
please edit
Doug Tody (Data Access Layer WG)
please edit
Nic Walton (GGF Astro-RG)
please edit
Roy Williams (VOEvent WG)
In section 3.2, for Contact information, I think there should be a place for telephone number. Also, I think multiple telephone numbers and emails should be allowed. This is because VOEvent schema clones the Contact schema from RM, and in that case it would be crucial to be able to contact the author of an event.
Once this change is made, I would add my vote for Recommendation.