VOSpace-1.0 WSDL and schema

This is a discussion page for the WSDL and schema for the VOSpace-1.0 service.

This is somewhere where we can post proposals for schema and WSDL to enable interested parties to discuss the different versions.

For each version there is a Change request section - please add to this and vote on other suggestions

  • +1 if you agree
  • -1 if you disagree
  • 0 if you have no particular preference

Once we have finalised the WSDL and schema, the final versions will be posted on the main Grid & Web Services page.



News

  • Schema discussion page created.

Core schema

This is the main section for schema and WSDL files.

The files for the 1.0 VOSpace release are

  1. VOSpace-v1.0.wsdl the main WSDL file.
  2. VOSpaceBase-v1.0.xsd a subsidiary schema file that contains core types that might be useful in implementing a VOSpace server cf. the WSDL which contains types that are used only in the web service interface.

These file are packaged in a zip file which is named with the release candidate number for each sucessive release candidate. The exact release candidate number is also reflected in the files in

  • the version attribute of the top level xsd:schema element in the schema file
  • the name attribute of the top level wsdl:definitions element in the WSDL file

Version 1.0rc1

This is the first 'official' release candidate of the VOSpace interface definition, and is based on version 0.21 of the specification document, though is known not to follow this document exactly, as there are areas still to be finalized for which the WSDL is the best 'source'.

Change Requests

Use namespaces in release candidates that include release number

Votes

name vote comment
PaulHarrison -1
DaveMorris +1
GuyRixon +1
MatthewGraham +1

Make sure that the naming of operations/parameters more closely matches the written specification

Votes

name vote comment
PaulHarrison +1
DaveMorris +1
GuyRixon +1
MatthewGraham +1

Remove enumerations for security related types

Votes

name vote comment
GuyRixon +1
PaulHarrison +1
DaveMorris +1 Not in the specification document

Remove enumerations of transport keys

Votes

name vote comment
GuyRixon +1
PaulHarrison +1 iff this issue is better specified in the standard document
DaveMorris +1 Open list of known transports defined in the standard document

Remove enumerations of parameter key values

Votes

name vote comment
GuyRixon +1
PaulHarrison +1 iff this issue is better specified in the standard document
DaveMorris +1 Open list of vos keys defined in the standard document

Remove any idea of callbacks

Votes

name vote comment
PaulHarrison +1 iff this issue is better specified in the standard document
GuyRixon +1
DaveMorris +1 Not in the specification document

Remove the use of ChangeOwner operation

Votes

name vote comment
PaulHarrison 0 we do want this concept in 2.0 definitely and 2.0 servers are supposed to be able to talk to 1.0 servers - if we remove it now, we need to have a 1.1 release that does have different WSDL - however if we accept that 1.1 could have different WSDL then it can be dropped from 1.0.
MatthewGraham +1
DaveMorris +1 Not in the specification document
GuyRixon +1  

Keep Transports/Formats as separate opertation

-- PaulHarrison - 13 Jun 2006

I agree with adding the new methods. However, this should be changed in the specification first, not the WSDL. Move this to the specification change page.

-- DaveMorris - 16 Jun 2006

Votes

name vote comment
DaveMorris -1 Change the specification document first
GuyRixon -1 Change spec first

Refactor use of DataObjectReference

This construct was there principally to get round difficulties in specifying the use-case "create a file with a server generated name" before the vos: URI scheme was approved. Not needed any more.

-- PaulHarrison - 16 Jun 2006

Needs to be much clearer what this represents.

-- DaveMorris - 16 Jun 2006

Consider use of Status responses for some operations

Changing the method signatures to return status codes should be defined in the specification first, not the WSDL. Move this to the specification change page.

-- DaveMorris - 16 Jun 2006

Votes

name vote comment
DaveMorris -1 Change the specification document first
GuyRixon -1 Don't see the need: we have faults for errors conditions

Experiments

The experiments have been moved to a separate page

Include WSDL for VO Standard Interfaces

Is the VOSI WSDL finalized?

Votes

name vote comment
PaulHarrison +1 proposer

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
Compressed Zip archivezip vospace-interface-1.0rc1.zip r1 manage 7.3 K 2006-06-13 - 15:34 PaulHarrison vospace-interface-1.0rc1.zip
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r24 | r14 < r13 < r12 < r11 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r12 - 2006-06-19 - PaulHarrison
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback